The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prognosis of Cancers Associated with Venous Thromboembolism
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the prognosis of cancer discovered during or after an episode of venous thromboembolism. METHODS: We linked the Danish National Registry of Patients, the Danish Cancer Registry, and the Danish Mortality Files to obtain data on the survival of patients who received a diagnosis of cancer at the same time as or after an episode of venous thromboembolism. Their survival was compared with that of patients with cancer who did not have venous thromboembolism (control patients), who were matched in terms of type of cancer, age, sex, and year of diagnosis. RESULTS: Of 668 patients who had cancer at the time of an episode of deep venous thromboembolism, 44.0 percent of those with data on the spread of disease (563 patients) had distant metastasis, as compared with 35.1 percent of 5371 control patients with data on spread (prevalence ratio, 1.26; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.40). In the group with cancer at the time of venous thromboembolism, the one-year survival rate was 12 percent, as compared with 36 percent in the control group (P<0.001), and the mortality ratio for the entire follow-up period was 2.20 (95 percent confidence interval, 2.05 to 2.40). Patients in whom cancer was diagnosed within one year after an episode of venous thromboembolism had a slightly increased risk of distant metastasis at the time of the diagnosis (prevalence ratio, 1.23 [95 percent confidence interval, 1.08 to 1.40]) and a relatively low rate of survival at one year (38 percent, vs. 47 percent in the control group; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Cancer diagnosed at the same time as or within one year after an episode of venous thromboembolism is associated with an advanced stage of cancer and a poor prognosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1998) · Pure Amsterdam UMC · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980701)83:1 · Cited by 3
Cited by
The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology
Schmidt, M., Pedersen, L., & Sørensen, H. T. (2014) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-014-9930-3 · Cited by 3,441
Self-citationKahn (2012) · doi:10.1378/chest.11-2296 · Cited by 2,693
Malignancies, prothrombotic mutations, and the risk of venous thrombosis
Blom, J. W. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.6.715 · Cited by 1,949
The Hypercoagulable State of Malignancy: Pathogenesis and Current Debate
Caine, G. J., Stonelake, P. S., Lip, G. Y. H., & Kehoe, S. T. (2002) · Neoplasia · doi:10.1038/sj.neo.7900263 · Cited by 576
Bodai, B. I., & Tuso, P. (2015) · The Permanente Journal · doi:10.7812/tpp/14-241 · Cited by 397
Metadata
- Authors
- Sørensen, H. T., Mellemkjær, L., Olsen, J. H., & Baron, J. A.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2000-12-21
- Volume
- 343
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 1846-1850
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2332736166
- Cited by
- 1,628
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognosis of Cancers Associated with Venous Thromboembolism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm200012213432504
- The paper
- Sørensen, H. T., Mellemkjær, L., Olsen, J. H., & Baron, J. A. (2000). Prognosis of Cancers Associated with Venous Thromboembolism. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200012213432504
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.