Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Anti-CTLA4 Antibody–Induced Lupus Nephritis

Fadel, Fouad, Karoui, Khalil El, Knebelmann, Bertrand·2009·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

To the Editor: A 64-year-old man with a history of metastatic melanoma was admitted to our hospital for the nephrotic syndrome in 2006. In 2005, subcutaneous metastases had been diagnosed, which were resistant to conventional chemotherapy. The patient then received monotherapy with ipilimumab (investigational agent, Bristol-Myers Squibb), a monoclonal antibody against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen 4 (CTLA4), at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight given intravenously every 3 weeks. Proteinuria was not present before the protocol was initiated, and the nephrotic syndrome was diagnosed after two injections. Physical examination showed only a 3-cm inguinal lymphadenopathy on the . . .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmc0904283

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Fadel, F., Karoui, K. E., & Knebelmann, B.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2009-07-09
Volume
361
Issue
2
Pages
211-212
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1971989824
Cited by
300
References
0
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.