Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 210

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Are All Readmissions Bad Readmissions?

Open access
Gorodeski, Eiran Z., Starling, Randall C., Blackstone, Eugene H.·2010·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Are All Readmissions Bad Readmissions?To The Editor: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) view readmission for any reason after an index hospitalization for heart failure as a sign of poor quality of care."From the patient perspective, readmission from any cause is an adverse event." 1 Little consideration has been given, however, to a potential association between readmissions and mortality, an outcome that is of primary interest to medical professionals and the general public.We examined the association between riskadjusted readmission and risk-adjusted death within 30 days after hospitalization for heart failure among 3857 hospitals included in the CMS Hospital Compare public reporting database (www .hospitalcompare.hhs.gov) that had no missing data.We used linear regression analysis with restricted cubic splines 2 (piecewise smoothing polynomials) (Fig. 1).Analysis was performed with the use of R, version 2.10.1 (www.r-project.org), and Harrell's Hmisc library.A higher occurrence of readmissions after index admissions for heart failure was associated with lower risk-adjusted 30-day mortality.Our findings suggest that readmissions could be "adversely" affected by a competing risk 3 of death -a patient who dies during the index episode of care can never be readmitted.Hence, if a hospital has a lower mortality rate, then a greater proportion of its discharged patients are eligible for readmission.As such, to some extent, a higher readmission rate may be a consequence of successful care.Furthermore, planned readmissions for procedures or surgery may represent appropriate care that decreases the risk of death, but this is not accounted for in Hospital Compare.These observations are consistent with a recent study of 3999 Medicare beneficiaries in California who were hospitalized at various hospitals with a principal diagnosis of heart failure.Hospitals that used more resources had lower mortality rates.4 It is unclear why the relation between 30-day readmissions and 30-day mortality was flat among hospitals with the lowest readmission rates (Fig. 1).We speculate that this has to do with variations in hospital characteristics between hospitals with low readmission rates versus those with high readmission rates or in hospitals' approaches to the journal's web and e-mail addresses

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmc1001882

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 210

Metadata

Authors
Gorodeski, E. Z., Starling, R. C., & Blackstone, E. H.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2010-07-15
Volume
363
Issue
3
Pages
297-298
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1977089899
Cited by
210
References
0
FWCI
7.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are All Readmissions Bad Readmissions? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmc1001882
The paper
Gorodeski, E. Z., Starling, R. C., & Blackstone, E. H. (2010). Are All Readmissions Bad Readmissions? New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmc1001882

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.