Cited by 108Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentPlatelet Disorders and TreatmentsChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research

Ruxolitinib versus Standard Therapy for the Treatment of Polycythemia Vera

Alessandro Maria Vannucchi·2015·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Ruxolitinib versus standard therapy for the treatment of polycythemia vera.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmc1502524

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Treatment with ruxolitinib resulted in clinical improvements in polycythemia vera and increased survival in primary myelofibrosis.

    “Treatment with the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib resulted in clinical improvements in polycythemia vera and an increased survival in primary myelofibrosis. 32 , 33”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vannucchi, A. M.
Corresponding author
Alessandro Maria Vannucchi
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2015-04-23
Volume
372
Issue
17
Pages
1670-1671
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W4242351610
Cited by
108
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Platelet Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Keywords
ruxolitinib, polycythemia vera, JAK inhibitors, standard treatment, myeloproliferative neoplasms, treatment comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review