The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fondaparinux Compared with Enoxaparin for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism after Elective Major Knee Surgery
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Despite thromboprophylaxis, major knee surgery carries a high risk of venous thromboembolism. Fondaparinux, the first of a new class of synthetic antithrombotic agents, may reduce this risk. METHODS: In a double-blind study, we randomly assigned 1049 consecutive patients undergoing elective major knee surgery to receive subcutaneous doses of either 2.5 mg of fondaparinux once daily or 30 mg of enoxaparin twice daily, with both treatments initiated postoperatively. The primary efficacy outcome was venous thromboembolism up to postoperative day 11, defined as deep-vein thrombosis detected by mandatory bilateral venography, documented symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis, or documented symptomatic pulmonary embolism. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. RESULTS: The primary efficacy outcome was assessed in 724 patients. The fondaparinux group had a significantly lower incidence of venous thromboembolism by day 11 (12.5 percent [45 of 361 patients]) than the enoxaparin group (27.8 percent [101 of 363 patients]; reduction in risk, 55.2 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 36.2 to 70.2; P<0.001). Major bleeding (including overt bleeding with a bleeding index of 2 or more) occurred more frequently in the fondaparinux group (P=0.006), but there were no significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of bleeding leading to death or reoperation or occurring in a critical organ. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing elective major knee surgery, postoperative treatment with 2.5 mg of fondaparinux once daily was significantly more effective in preventing deep-vein thrombosis than 30 mg of enoxaparin twice daily.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kahn (2012) · doi:10.1378/chest.11-2296 · Cited by 2,693
Rivaroxaban versus Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis after Total Knee Arthroplasty
Lassen, M. R., Ageno, W., Borris, L. C., Lieberman, J. R., Rosencher, N., Bandel, T. J., Misselwitz, F., & Turpie, A. G. G. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa076016 · Cited by 1,295
Self-citationAgnelli, G., Bergqvist, D., Cohen, A. T., Gallus, A. S., & Gent, M. (2005) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.5154 · Cited by 337
Steele, K. E., Canner, J., Prokopowicz, G., Verde, F., Beselman, A., Wyse, R., Chen, J., Streiff, M., Magnuson, T., Lidor, A., et al. (2015) · Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.soard.2014.10.003 · Cited by 54
Methodological issues in trials assessing primary prophylaxis of venous thrombo-embolism
Thabut, G., Estellat, C., Boutron, I., Samama, C. M., & Ravaud, P. (2006) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi587 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Bauer, K. A., Eriksson, B. I., Lassen, M. R., & Turpie, A. G. G.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 345
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 1305-1310
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2054169479
- Cited by
- 666
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fondaparinux Compared with Enoxaparin for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism after Elective Major Knee Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa011099
- The paper
- Bauer, K. A., Eriksson, B. I., Lassen, M. R., & Turpie, A. G. G. (2001). Fondaparinux Compared with Enoxaparin for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism after Elective Major Knee Surgery. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa011099
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.