Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 356

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Screening of Infants and Mortality Due to Neuroblastoma

Open access
Woods, William G., Gao, Ru-Nie, Shuster, Jonathan J., Robison, Leslie L., Bernstein, Mark, Weitzman, Sheila, Bunin, Greta, Levy, Isra, Brossard, Josee, Dougherty, Geoffrey, Tuchman, Mendel, Lemieux, Bernard·2002·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neuroblastoma, the most common extracranial solid tumor that occurs in early childhood, can be identified in the preclinical stages by the detection of catecholamines in the urine. However, it is unknown whether routine screening for neuroblastoma reduces mortality due to this disease. METHODS: Through their parents, we offered screening for neuroblastoma at three weeks and six months of age to all 476,654 children born in the province of Quebec, Canada, during a five-year period (May 1, 1989, through April 30, 1994). The participation rate was 92 percent. The rate of death due to neuroblastoma was determined and compared with the rates in several unscreened control populations born during the same period. RESULTS: Among children younger than eight years of age in the Quebec cohort, there were 22 deaths due to neuroblastoma; the cumulative (+/-SE) mortality rate due to neuroblastoma was 4.78+/-1.14 per 100,000 children over a period of nine years. The standardized incidence ratios for death due to neuroblastoma for the Quebec cohort were 1.11 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.64 to 1.92) as compared with a control group in Ontario, Canada; 0.90 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.48 to 1.70) as compared with a control group in Minnesota; 1.40 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.81 to 2.41) as compared with a control group in Florida; and 0.96 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.56 to 1.66) as compared with a control group in the Greater Delaware Valley. The standardized mortality ratio for the Quebec cohort as compared with the rest of Canada was 1.39 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.85 to 2.30); the odds ratio for the comparison with a cohort born in Quebec before the screening program began was 0.98 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.54 to 1.77). CONCLUSIONS: Screening infants for neuroblastoma does not appear to reduce mortality due to this disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa012387

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 356

Metadata

Authors
Woods, W. G., Gao, R.-N., Shuster, J. J., Robison, L. L., Bernstein, M., Weitzman, S., Bunin, G., Levy, I., Brossard, J., Dougherty, G., Tuchman, M., & Lemieux, B.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2002-04-04
Volume
346
Issue
14
Pages
1041-1046
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1995294036
Cited by
356
References
12
FWCI
16.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Screening of Infants and Mortality Due to Neuroblastoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa012387
The paper
Woods, W. G., Gao, R.-N., Shuster, J. J., Robison, L. L., Bernstein, M., Weitzman, S., Bunin, G., Levy, I., Brossard, J., Dougherty, G., Tuchman, M., & Lemieux, B. (2002). Screening of Infants and Mortality Due to Neuroblastoma. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa012387

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.