Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,222

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hepatitis B e Antigen and the Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Yang, Hwai-I, Lu, Sheng-Nan, Liaw, Yun-Fan, You, San-Lin, Sun, Chien-An, Wang, Li-Yu, Hsiao, Chuhsing K., Chen, Pei-Jer, Chen, Ding-Shinn, Chen, Chien-Jen·2002·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The presence of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) in serum indicates active viral replication in hepatocytes. HBeAg is thus a surrogate marker for the presence of hepatitis B virus DNA. We conducted a prospective study to determine the relation between positivity for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBeAg and the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: In 1991 and 1992, we enrolled 11,893 men without evidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (age range, 30 to 65 years) from seven townships in Taiwan. Serum samples obtained at the time of enrollment were tested for HBsAg and HBeAg by radioimmunoassay. The diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma was ascertained through data linkage with the computerized National Cancer Registry in Taiwan and with death certificates. We performed a multiple regression analysis to determine the relative risk of hepatocellular carcinoma among men who were positive for HBsAg alone or for HBsAg and HBeAg, as compared with those who were negative for both. RESULTS: There were 111 cases of newly diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma during 92,359 person-years of follow-up. The incidence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma was 1169 cases per 100,000 person-years among men who were positive for both HBsAg and HBeAg, 324 per 100,000 person-years for those who were positive for HBsAg only, and 39 per 100,000 person-years for those who were negative for both. After adjustment for age, sex, the presence or absence of antibodies against hepatitis C virus, cigarette-smoking status, and use or nonuse of alcohol, the relative risk of hepatocellular carcinoma was 9.6 (95 percent confidence interval, 6.0 to 15.2) among men who were positive for HBsAg alone and 60.2 (95 percent confidence interval, 35.5 to 102.1) among those who were positive for both HBsAg and HBeAg, as compared with men who were negative for both. CONCLUSIONS: Positivity for HBeAg is associated with an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa013215

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,222

Metadata

Authors
Yang, H.-I., Lu, S.-N., Liaw, Y.-F., You, S.-L., Sun, C.-A., Wang, L.-Y., Hsiao, C. K., Chen, P.-J., Chen, D.-S., & Chen, C.-J.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2002-07-18
Volume
347
Issue
3
Pages
168-174
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2314866596
Cited by
1,222
References
1
FWCI
37.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hepatitis B e Antigen and the Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa013215
The paper
Yang, H.-I., Lu, S.-N., Liaw, Y.-F., You, S.-L., Sun, C.-A., Wang, L.-Y., Hsiao, C. K., Chen, P.-J., Chen, D.-S., & Chen, C.-J. (2002). Hepatitis B e Antigen and the Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa013215

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.