The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prospective Study of Polyomavirus Type BK Replication and Nephropathy in Renal-Transplant Recipients
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Nephropathy associated with the polyomavirus type BK (BKV) nephropathy has emerged as a cause of allograft failure linked to immunosuppressive regimens containing tacrolimus or mycophenolate mofetil. The presence of viral inclusions, known as "decoy cells," in urine and the presence of BKV DNA in plasma have been proposed as markers for the replication of BKV and associated nephropathy, but data from prospective studies have been lacking. METHODS: In a prospective, single-center study, we followed 78 renal-transplant recipients who were receiving immunosuppressive therapy that included tacrolimus (37 patients) or mycophenolate mofetil (41 patients). Urine was tested for the presence of decoy cells at routine visits. BKV DNA was measured 3, 6, and 12 months after transplantation and whenever decoy cells were detected. The viral load in plasma was quantified with the use of a real-time polymerase-chain-reaction method. Renal biopsy was performed if allograft function deteriorated. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients had decoy-cell shedding a median of 16 weeks after transplantation (range, 2 to 69), 10 patients had BKV viremia at a median of 23 weeks (range, 4 to 73), and 5 had BKV nephropathy at a median of 28 weeks (range, 8 to 86). Kaplan-Meier estimates of the probability of decoy-cell shedding, viremia, and nephropathy were 30 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 20 to 40 percent), 13 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 5 to 21 percent), and 8 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 1 to 15 percent), respectively. Antirejection treatment, particularly with corticosteroids, was associated with BKV replication and nephropathy. The viral load in plasma was higher in patients with BKV nephropathy than in those without nephropathy (P<0.001 by the Mann-Whitney test). BKV antibodies were detected in 77 percent of the 78 patients before transplantation, including 4 of 5 with BKV nephropathy. CONCLUSIONS: BKV nephropathy in renal-transplant recipients represents a secondary infection associated with rejection and its treatment in most cases and could be monitored by measuring the viral load in plasma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
van Delden, C., Stampf, S., Hirsch, H. H., Manuel, O., Meylan, P., Cusini, A., Hirzel, C., Khanna, N., Weisser, M., Garzoni, C., et al. (2020) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciz1113 · Cited by 319
Self-citationBaker, R. J., Mark, P. B., Patel, R. K., Stevens, K. K., & Palmer, N. (2017) · BMC Nephrology · doi:10.1186/s12882-017-0553-2 · Cited by 211
Metadata
- Authors
- Hirsch, H. H., Knowles, W., Dickenmann, M., Passweg, J., Klimkait, T., Mihatsch, M. J., & Steiger, J.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2002-08-15
- Volume
- 347
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 488-496
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2088168913
- Cited by
- 1,218
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective Study of Polyomavirus Type BK Replication and Nephropathy in Renal-Transplant Recipients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa020439
- The paper
- Hirsch, H. H., Knowles, W., Dickenmann, M., Passweg, J., Klimkait, T., Mihatsch, M. J., & Steiger, J. (2002). Prospective Study of Polyomavirus Type BK Replication and Nephropathy in Renal-Transplant Recipients. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa020439
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.