Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 475

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Methotrexate versus Cyclosporine in Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis

Open access
Heydendael, Vera M.R., Spuls, Phyllis I., Opmeer, Brent C., de Borgie, Corianne A.J.M., Reitsma, Johannes B., Goldschmidt, Wouter F.M., Bossuyt, Patrick M.M., Bos, Jan D., de Rie, Menno A.·2003·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Methotrexate and cyclosporine are well-known systemic therapies for moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. We conducted a randomized, controlled trial comparing methotrexate and cyclosporine in terms of effectiveness, side effects, and the quality of life. METHODS: A total of 88 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were randomly assigned to treatment for 16 weeks with either methotrexate (44 patients; initial dose, 15 mg per week) or cyclosporine (44 patients; initial dose, 3 mg per kilogram of body weight per day) and were followed for another 36 weeks. The primary outcome was the difference between groups in the psoriasis area-and-severity index after 16 weeks of treatment, after adjustment for base-line values; scores were determined in a blinded fashion by trained observers. RESULTS: Two patients were excluded from the analysis after randomization because they were found to be ineligible, and one patient withdrew his consent. Twelve patients in the methotrexate group had to discontinue treatment because of reversible elevations in liver-enzyme levels, and 1 patient in the cyclosporine group had to do so because of an elevation in the bilirubin level, but all 13 were included in the analysis. After 16 weeks of treatment, the mean (+/-SE) score for the psoriasis area-and-severity index decreased from 13.4+/-3.6 at base line to 5.0+/-0.7 among 43 patients treated with methotrexate, whereas the score decreased from 14.0+/-6.6 to 3.8+/-0.5 among 42 patients treated with cyclosporine. After adjustment for base-line values, the mean absolute difference in values at 16 weeks was 1.3 (95 percent confidence interval, -0.2 to 2.8; P=0.09). The physician's global assessment of the extent of psoriasis, the time to and the rates of remission, and the quality of life were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in efficacy were found between methotrexate and cyclosporine for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa021359

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 475

Metadata

Authors
Heydendael, V. M. R., Spuls, P. I., Opmeer, B. C., de Borgie, C. A. J. M., Reitsma, J. B., Goldschmidt, W. F. M., Bossuyt, P. M. M., Bos, J. D., & de Rie, M. A.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2003-08-14
Volume
349
Issue
7
Pages
658-665
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1996773947
Cited by
475
References
1
FWCI
10.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methotrexate versus Cyclosporine in Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa021359
The paper
Heydendael, V. M. R., Spuls, P. I., Opmeer, B. C., de Borgie, C. A. J. M., Reitsma, J. B., Goldschmidt, W. F. M., Bossuyt, P. M. M., Bos, J. D., & de Rie, M. A. (2003). Methotrexate versus Cyclosporine in Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa021359

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.