Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nitroprusside in Critically Ill Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Aortic Stenosis

Open access
Khot, Umesh N., Novaro, Gian M., Popović, Zoran B., Mills, Roger M., Thomas, James D., Tuzcu, E. Murat, Hammer, Donald, Nissen, Steven E., Francis, Gary S.·2003·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vasodilators are considered to be contraindicated in patients with severe aortic stenosis because of concern that they may precipitate life-threatening hypotension. However, vasodilators such as nitroprusside may improve myocardial performance if peripheral vasoconstriction is contributing to afterload. METHODS: We determined the response to intravenous nitroprusside in 25 patients with severe aortic stenosis and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Patients were included in the study if they had been admitted to the intensive care unit for invasive hemodynamic monitoring of heart failure and if they had a depressed ejection fraction (<or=0.35), severe aortic stenosis (aortic-valve area, <or=1 cm2), and a depressed cardiac index (<or=2.2 liters per minute per square meter). Patients were excluded if they had hypotension, defined as either the need for intravenous inotropic or pressor agents or a low mean systemic arterial pressure (<60 mm Hg). Patients were enrolled irrespective of other, coexisting valve disease or coronary artery disease. RESULTS: At base line, the mean (+/-SD) ejection fraction was 0.21+/-0.08; the aortic-valve area was 0.6+/-0.2 cm2, with peak and mean gradients of 65+/-37 and 39+/-23 mm Hg, respectively; and the cardiac index was 1.60+/-0.35 liters per minute per square meter. After six hours of therapy with nitroprusside (at which time the dose had been increased to a mean of 103+/-67 microg per minute), the cardiac index had increased to 2.22+/-0.44 liters per minute per square meter (P<0.001 for the comparison with base line). After 24 hours of nitroprusside infusion (dose, 128+/-96 microg per minute), the cardiac index had increased further, to 2.52+/-0.55 liters per minute per square meter (P<0.001 for the comparison with base line). Nitroprusside was well tolerated and had minimal side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Nitroprusside rapidly and markedly improves cardiac function in patients with decompensated heart failure due to severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction and severe aortic stenosis. It provides a safe and effective bridge to aortic-valve replacement or oral vasodilator therapy in these critically ill patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa022021

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
Khot, U. N., Novaro, G. M., Popović, Z. B., Mills, R. M., Thomas, J. D., Tuzcu, E. M., Hammer, D., Nissen, S. E., & Francis, G. S.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2003-05
Volume
348
Issue
18
Pages
1756-1763
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2098421791
Cited by
276
References
2
FWCI
11.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitroprusside in Critically Ill Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Aortic Stenosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa022021
The paper
Khot, U. N., Novaro, G. M., Popović, Z. B., Mills, R. M., Thomas, J. D., Tuzcu, E. M., Hammer, D., Nissen, S. E., & Francis, G. S. (2003). Nitroprusside in Critically Ill Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Aortic Stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa022021

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.