Cited by 808Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-Term, Low-Intensity Warfarin Therapy for the Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Standard therapy to prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism includes 3 to 12 months of treatment with full-dose warfarin with a target international normalized ratio (INR) between 2.0 and 3.0. However, for long-term management, no therapeutic agent has shown an acceptable benefit-to-risk ratio. METHODS: Patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism who had received full-dose anticoagulation therapy for a median of 6.5 months were randomly assigned to placebo or low-intensity warfarin (target INR, 1.5 to 2.0). Participants were followed for recurrent venous thromboembolism, major hemorrhage, and death. RESULTS: The trial was terminated early after 508 patients had undergone randomization and had been followed for up to 4.3 years (mean, 2.1). Of 253 patients assigned to placebo, 37 had recurrent venous thromboembolism (7.2 per 100 person-years), as compared with 14 of 255 patients assigned to low-intensity warfarin (2.6 per 100 person-years), a risk reduction of 64 percent (hazard ratio, 0.36 [95 percent confidence interval, 0.19 to 0.67]; P<0.001). Risk reductions were similar for all subgroups, including those with and those without inherited thrombophilia. Major hemorrhage occurred in two patients assigned to placebo and five assigned to low-intensity warfarin (P=0.25). Eight patients in the placebo group and four in the group assigned to low-intensity warfarin died (P=0.26). Low-intensity warfarin was thus associated with a 48 percent reduction in the composite end point of recurrent venous thromboembolism, major hemorrhage, or death. According to per-protocol and as-treated analyses, the reduction in the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism was between 76 and 81 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term, low-intensity warfarin therapy is a highly effective method of preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa035029

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kearon C, 2002, Blood, 100, 150a
  2. Eriksson H, 2002, Blood, 100, 81a

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 807

Metadata

Authors
Ridker, P. M., Goldhaber, S. Z., Danielson, E., Rosenberg, Y., Eby, C. S., Deitcher, S. R., Cushman, M., Moll, S., Kessler, C. M., Elliott, C. G., Paulson, R., Wong, T., Bauer, K. A., Schwartz, B. A., Miletich, J. P., Bounameaux, H., & Glynn, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
  • LDS Hospital (US)
  • Altru Health System (US)
  • St. Boniface Hospital (CA)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2003-04-10
Volume
348
Issue
15
Pages
1425-1434
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2112757583
Cited by
808
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 44
FWCI
53.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Keywords
recurrent venous thromboembolism, long-term anticoagulation, idiopathic venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, inherited thrombophilia, international normalized ratio, benefit-risk balance
MeSH terms
Aged, Anticoagulants, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Hemorrhage, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pulmonary Embolism, Risk, Thromboembolism, Warfarin, International Normalized Ratio, Venous Thrombosis, Stroke, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review