Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,321

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Coronary-Artery Revascularization before Elective Major Vascular Surgery

Open access
McFalls, Edward O., Ward, Herbert B., Moritz, Thomas E., Goldman, Steven, Krupski, William C., Littooy, Fred, Pierpont, Gordon, Santilli, Steve, Rapp, Joseph, Hattler, Brack, Shunk, Kendrick, Jaenicke, Connie, Thottapurathu, Lizy, Ellis, Nancy, Reda, Domenic J., Henderson, William G.·2004·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The benefit of coronary-artery revascularization before elective major vascular surgery is unclear. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients at increased risk for perioperative cardiac complications and clinically significant coronary artery disease to undergo either revascularization or no revascularization before elective major vascular surgery. The primary end point was long-term mortality. RESULTS: Of 5859 patients scheduled for vascular operations at 18 Veterans Affairs medical centers, 510 (9 percent) were eligible for the study and were randomly assigned to either coronary-artery revascularization before surgery or no revascularization before surgery. The indications for a vascular operation were an expanding abdominal aortic aneurysm (33 percent) or arterial occlusive disease of the legs (67 percent). Among the patients assigned to preoperative coronary-artery revascularization, percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 59 percent, and bypass surgery was performed in 41 percent. The median time from randomization to vascular surgery was 54 days in the revascularization group and 18 days in the group not undergoing revascularization (P<0.001). At 2.7 years after randomization, mortality in the revascularization group was 22 percent and in the no-revascularization group 23 percent (relative risk, 0.98; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.70 to 1.37; P=0.92). Within 30 days after the vascular operation, a postoperative myocardial infarction, defined by elevated troponin levels, occurred in 12 percent of the revascularization group and 14 percent of the no-revascularization group (P=0.37). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary-artery revascularization before elective vascular surgery does not significantly alter the long-term outcome. On the basis of these data, a strategy of coronary-artery revascularization before elective vascular surgery among patients with stable cardiac symptoms cannot be recommended.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa041905

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,321

Metadata

Authors
McFalls, E. O., Ward, H. B., Moritz, T. E., Goldman, S., Krupski, W. C., Littooy, F., Pierpont, G., Santilli, S., Rapp, J., Hattler, B., Shunk, K., Jaenicke, C., Thottapurathu, L., Ellis, N., Reda, D. J., & Henderson, W. G.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2004-12-30
Volume
351
Issue
27
Pages
2795-2804
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2008162308
Cited by
1,321
References
1
FWCI
45.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coronary-Artery Revascularization before Elective Major Vascular Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa041905
The paper
McFalls, E. O., Ward, H. B., Moritz, T. E., Goldman, S., Krupski, W. C., Littooy, F., Pierpont, G., Santilli, S., Rapp, J., Hattler, B., Shunk, K., Jaenicke, C., Thottapurathu, L., Ellis, N., Reda, D. J., & Henderson, W. G. (2004). Coronary-Artery Revascularization before Elective Major Vascular Surgery. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa041905

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.