The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Treatment of Early Childhood Medulloblastoma by Postoperative Chemotherapy Alone
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The prognosis for young children with medulloblastoma is poor, and survivors are at high risk for cognitive deficits. We conducted a trial of the treatment of this brain tumor by intensive postoperative chemotherapy alone. METHODS: After surgery, children received three cycles of intravenous chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, methotrexate, carboplatin, and etoposide) and intraventricular methotrexate. Treatment was terminated if a complete remission was achieved. Leukoencephalopathy and cognitive deficits were evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-three children were treated according to protocol. In children who had complete resection (17 patients), residual tumor (14), and macroscopic metastases (12), the five-year progression-free and overall survival rates (+/-SE) were 82+/-9 percent and 93+/-6 percent, 50+/-13 percent and 56+/-14 percent, and 33+/-14 percent and 38+/-15 percent, respectively. The rates in 31 patients without macroscopic metastases were 68+/-8 percent and 77+/-8 percent. Desmoplastic histology, metastatic disease, and an age younger than two years were independent prognostic factors for tumor relapse and survival. Treatment strategies at relapse were successful in 8 of 16 patients. There were no major instances of unexpected toxicity. In 19 of 23 children, asymptomatic leukoencephalopathy was detected by magnetic resonance imaging. After treatment, the mean IQ was significantly lower than that of healthy controls within the same age group but higher than that of patients in a previous trial who had received radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative chemotherapy alone is a promising treatment for medulloblastoma in young children without metastases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Outcomes for children and adolescents with cancer: challenges for the twenty-first century
Smith, M. A., Seibel, N. L., Altekruse, S. F., Ries, L. A. G., Melbert, D. L., O'Leary, M., Smith, F. O., & Reaman, G. H. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.27.0421 · Cited by 1,026
Kool, M., Koster, J., Bunt, J., Hasselt, N. E., Lakeman, A., van Sluis, P., Troost, D., Meeteren, N. S.-V., Caron, H. N., Cloos, J., et al. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003088 · Cited by 722
Self-citationHorbinski, C., Berger, T., Packer, R. J., & Wen, P. Y. (2022) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-022-00679-w · Cited by 312
Role of MYC in medulloblastoma
Roussel, M. F., & Robinson, G. W. (2013) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a014308 · Cited by 180
Subgroup-specific immune and stromal microenvironment in medulloblastoma
Bockmayr, M., Mohme, M., Klauschen, F., Winkler, B., Budczies, J., Rutkowski, S., & Schüller, U. (2018) · OncoImmunology · doi:10.1080/2162402x.2018.1462430 · Cited by 121
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rutkowski, S., Bode, U., Deinlein, F., Ottensmeier, H., Warmuth-Metz, M., Soerensen, N., Graf, N., Emser, A., Pietsch, T., Wolff, J. E. A., Kortmann, R. D., & Kuehl, J.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2005-03-10
- Volume
- 352
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 978-986
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2071064669
- Cited by
- 751
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of Early Childhood Medulloblastoma by Postoperative Chemotherapy Alone. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa042176
- The paper
- Rutkowski, S., Bode, U., Deinlein, F., Ottensmeier, H., Warmuth-Metz, M., Soerensen, N., Graf, N., Emser, A., Pietsch, T., Wolff, J. E. A., Kortmann, R. D., & Kuehl, J. (2005). Treatment of Early Childhood Medulloblastoma by Postoperative Chemotherapy Alone. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa042176
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.