The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Entecavir versus Lamivudine for Patients with HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Entecavir is a potent and selective antiviral agent that has demonstrated efficacy in phase 2 studies in patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 648 patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B who had not previously been treated with a nucleoside analogue to receive 0.5 mg of entecavir or 100 mg of lamivudine once daily for a minimum of 52 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was histologic improvement (a decrease by at least two points in the Knodell necroinflammatory score, without worsening of fibrosis). RESULTS: Histologic improvement after 48 weeks of treatment occurred in 208 of 296 patients in the entecavir group who had adequate baseline liver-biopsy specimens that could be evaluated (70 percent), as compared with 174 of 287 such patients in the lamivudine group (61 percent, P=0.01). More patients in the entecavir group than in the lamivudine group had undetectable serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels according to a polymerase-chain-reaction assay (90 percent vs. 72 percent, P<0.001) and normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels (78 percent vs. 71 percent, P=0.045). The mean reduction in serum HBV DNA levels from baseline to week 48 was greater with entecavir than with lamivudine (5.0 vs. 4.5 log [on a base-10 scale] copies per milliliter, P<0.001). There was no evidence of resistance to entecavir. Safety and adverse-event profiles were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B who had not previously been treated with a nucleoside analogue, the rates of histologic improvement, virologic response, and normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels were significantly higher at 48 weeks with entecavir than with lamivudine. The safety profile of the two agents was similar, and there was no evidence of viral resistance to entecavir. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00035789.).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Terrault, N. A., Lok, A. S. F., McMahon, B. J., Chang, K., Hwang, J. P., Jonas, M. M., Brown, R. S., Bzowej, N. H., & Wong, J. B. (2018) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.29800 · Cited by 4,306
Self-citationLok, A. S. F., & McMahon, B. J. (2007) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.21513 · Cited by 3,087
Self-citationApproved Antiviral Drugs over the Past 50 Years
De Clercq, E., & Li, G. (2016) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00102-15 · Cited by 1,430
Dienstag, J. L. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0801644 · Cited by 961
Asian-Pacific consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B: a 2008 update
Liaw, Y.-F., Leung, N., Kao, J.-H., Piratvisuth, T., Gane, E., Han, K.-H., Guan, R., Lau, G. K. K., Locarnini, S., & for the Chronic Hepatitis B Guideline Working Party of the Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (2008) · Hepatology International · doi:10.1007/s12072-008-9080-3 · Cited by 867
Metadata
- Authors
- Lai, C.-L., Shouval, D., Lok, A. S., Chang, T.-T., Cheinquer, H., Goodman, Z., DeHertogh, D., Wilber, R., Zink, R. C., Cross, A., Colonno, R., & Fernandes, L.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2006-03-09
- Volume
- 354
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1011-1020
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2108147025
- Cited by
- 1,188
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 91.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Entecavir versus Lamivudine for Patients with HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa051287
- The paper
- Lai, C.-L., Shouval, D., Lok, A. S., Chang, T.-T., Cheinquer, H., Goodman, Z., DeHertogh, D., Wilber, R., Zink, R. C., Cross, A., Colonno, R., & Fernandes, L. (2006). Entecavir versus Lamivudine for Patients with HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa051287
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.