Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 646

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Development and Validation of a Risk Score for Predicting Death in Chagas' Heart Disease

Open access
Rassi, Anis, Rassi, Anis, Little, William C., Xavier, Sérgio S., Rassi, Sérgio G., Rassi, Alexandre G., Rassi, Gustavo G., Hasslocher-Moreno, Alejandro, Sousa, Andrea S., Scanavacca, Maurício I.·2006·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chagas' disease is an important health problem in Latin America, and cardiac involvement is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. We developed a model to predict the risk of death in patients with Chagas' heart disease. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 424 outpatients from a regional Brazilian cohort. The association of potential risk factors with death was tested by Cox proportional-hazards analysis, and a risk score was created. The model was validated in 153 patients from a separate community hospital. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 7.9 years, 130 patients in the development cohort died. Six independent prognostic factors were identified, and each was assigned a number of points proportional to its regression coefficient: New York Heart Association class III or IV (5 points), evidence of cardiomegaly on radiography (5 points), left ventricular systolic dysfunction on echocardiography (3 points), nonsustained ventricular tachycardia on 24-hour Holter monitoring (3 points), low QRS voltage on electrocardiography (2 points), and male sex (2 points). We calculated risk scores for each patient and defined three risk groups: low risk (0 to 6 points), intermediate risk (7 to 11 points), and high risk (12 to 20 points). In the development cohort, the 10-year mortality rates for these three groups were 10 percent, 44 percent, and 84 percent, respectively. In the validation cohort, the corresponding mortality rates were 9 percent, 37 percent, and 85 percent. The C statistic for the point system was 0.84 in the development cohort and 0.81 in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: A simple risk score was developed to predict death in Chagas' heart disease and was validated in an independent cohort.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa053241

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 646

Metadata

Authors
Rassi, A., Rassi, A., Little, W. C., Xavier, S. S., Rassi, S. G., Rassi, A. G., Rassi, G. G., Hasslocher-Moreno, A., Sousa, A. S., & Scanavacca, M. I.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2006-08-24
Volume
355
Issue
8
Pages
799-808
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2089821017
Cited by
646
References
0
FWCI
23.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and Validation of a Risk Score for Predicting Death in Chagas' Heart Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa053241
The paper
Rassi, A., Rassi, A., Little, W. C., Xavier, S. S., Rassi, S. G., Rassi, A. G., Rassi, G. G., Hasslocher-Moreno, A., Sousa, A. S., & Scanavacca, M. I. (2006). Development and Validation of a Risk Score for Predicting Death in Chagas' Heart Disease. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa053241

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.