The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Development and Validation of a Risk Score for Predicting Death in Chagas' Heart Disease
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Chagas' disease is an important health problem in Latin America, and cardiac involvement is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. We developed a model to predict the risk of death in patients with Chagas' heart disease. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 424 outpatients from a regional Brazilian cohort. The association of potential risk factors with death was tested by Cox proportional-hazards analysis, and a risk score was created. The model was validated in 153 patients from a separate community hospital. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 7.9 years, 130 patients in the development cohort died. Six independent prognostic factors were identified, and each was assigned a number of points proportional to its regression coefficient: New York Heart Association class III or IV (5 points), evidence of cardiomegaly on radiography (5 points), left ventricular systolic dysfunction on echocardiography (3 points), nonsustained ventricular tachycardia on 24-hour Holter monitoring (3 points), low QRS voltage on electrocardiography (2 points), and male sex (2 points). We calculated risk scores for each patient and defined three risk groups: low risk (0 to 6 points), intermediate risk (7 to 11 points), and high risk (12 to 20 points). In the development cohort, the 10-year mortality rates for these three groups were 10 percent, 44 percent, and 84 percent, respectively. In the validation cohort, the corresponding mortality rates were 9 percent, 37 percent, and 85 percent. The C statistic for the point system was 0.84 in the development cohort and 0.81 in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: A simple risk score was developed to predict death in Chagas' heart disease and was validated in an independent cohort.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rassi, A., Rassi, A., & Marin-Neto, J. A. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60061-x · Cited by 2,119
Self-citationAmerican Trypanosomiasis (Chagas Disease)
Rassi, A., Rassi, A., & Marcondes de Rezende, J. (2012) · Infectious Disease Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.idc.2012.03.002 · Cited by 508
Self-citationElectrocardiographic Manifestations of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Myocarditis
Power, J. R., Alexandre, J., Choudhary, A., Ozbay, B., Hayek, S., Asnani, A., Tamura, Y., Aras, M., Cautela, J., Thuny, F., et al. (2021) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.121.055816 · Cited by 136
Derivation and Validation of a Simple Perioperative Sleep Apnea Prediction Score
Ramachandran, S. K., Kheterpal, S., Consens, F., Shanks, A., Doherty, T. M., Morris, M., & Tremper, K. K. (2010) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e3181d489b0 · Cited by 117
Nielsen, J. C., Lin, Y.-J., de Oliveira Figueiredo, M. J., Sepehri Shamloo, A., Alfie, A., Boveda, S., Dagres, N., Di Toro, D., Eckhardt, L. L., Ellenbogen, K., et al. (2020) · EP Europace · doi:10.1093/europace/euaa065 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Rassi, A., Rassi, A., Little, W. C., Xavier, S. S., Rassi, S. G., Rassi, A. G., Rassi, G. G., Hasslocher-Moreno, A., Sousa, A. S., & Scanavacca, M. I.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2006-08-24
- Volume
- 355
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 799-808
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2089821017
- Cited by
- 646
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and Validation of a Risk Score for Predicting Death in Chagas' Heart Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa053241
- The paper
- Rassi, A., Rassi, A., Little, W. C., Xavier, S. S., Rassi, S. G., Rassi, A. G., Rassi, G. G., Hasslocher-Moreno, A., Sousa, A. S., & Scanavacca, M. I. (2006). Development and Validation of a Risk Score for Predicting Death in Chagas' Heart Disease. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa053241
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.