The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Five-Gene Signature and Clinical Outcome in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Current staging methods are inadequate for predicting the outcome of treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We developed a five-gene signature that is closely associated with survival of patients with NSCLC. METHODS: We used computer-generated random numbers to assign 185 frozen specimens for microarray analysis, real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis, or both. We studied gene expression in frozen specimens of lung-cancer tissue from 125 randomly selected patients who had undergone surgical resection of NSCLC and evaluated the association between the level of expression and survival. We used risk scores and decision-tree analysis to develop a gene-expression model for the prediction of the outcome of treatment of NSCLC. For validation, we used randomly assigned specimens from 60 other patients. RESULTS: Sixteen genes that correlated with survival among patients with NSCLC were identified by analyzing microarray data and risk scores. We selected five genes (DUSP6, MMD, STAT1, ERBB3, and LCK) for RT-PCR and decision-tree analysis. The five-gene signature was an independent predictor of relapse-free and overall survival. We validated the model with data from an independent cohort of 60 patients with NSCLC and with a set of published microarray data from 86 patients with NSCLC. CONCLUSIONS: Our five-gene signature is closely associated with relapse-free and overall survival among patients with NSCLC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Gene-expression profiles predict survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma
Beer, D. G., Kardia, S. L. R., Huang, C.-C., Giordano, T. J., Levin, A. M., Misek, D. E., Lin, L., Chen, G., Gharib, T. G., Thomas, D. G., et al. (2002) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm733 · Cited by 2,025
Cited by
Volatile Organic Compounds of Lung Cancer and Possible Biochemical Pathways
Hakim, M., Broza, Y. Y., Barash, O., Peled, N., Phillips, M., Amann, A., & Haick, H. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300174a · Cited by 953
Hu, Z., Chen, X., Zhao, Y., Tian, T., Jin, G., Shu, Y., Chen, Y., Xu, L., Zen, K., Zhang, C., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.24.9342 · Cited by 798
Li, B., Cui, Y., Diehn, M., & Li, R. (2017) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1609 · Cited by 514
de Reyniès, A., Assié, G., Rickman, D. S., Tissier, F., Groussin, L., René-Corail, F., Dousset, B., Bertagna, X., Clauser, E., & Bertherat, J. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.18.5678 · Cited by 382
Defining the biological basis of radiomic phenotypes in lung cancer
Grossmann, P., Stringfield, O., El-Hachem, N., Bui, M. M., Rios Velazquez, E., Parmar, C., Leijenaar, R. T., Haibe-Kains, B., Lambin, P., Gillies, R. J., et al. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.23421 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, H.-Y., Yu, S.-L., Chen, C.-H., Chang, G.-C., Chen, C.-Y., Yuan, A., Cheng, C.-L., Wang, C.-H., Terng, H.-J., Kao, S.-F., Chan, W.-K., Li, H.-N., Liu, C.-C., Singh, S., Chen, W. J., Chen, J. J. W., & Yang, P.-C.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2007-01-04
- Volume
- 356
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-20
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2084001490
- Cited by
- 935
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 46.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.