Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 576

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Genomic Strategy to Refine Prognosis in Early-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Open access
Potti, Anil, Mukherjee, Sayan, Petersen, Rebecca, Dressman, Holly K., Bild, Andrea, Koontz, Jason, Kratzke, Robert, Watson, Mark A., Kelley, Michael, Ginsburg, Geoffrey S., West, Mike, Harpole, David H., Nevins, Joseph R.·2006·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have indicated a benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage IB, II, or IIIA--but not stage IA--non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This classification scheme is probably an imprecise predictor of the prognosis of an individual patient. Indeed, approximately 25 percent of patients with stage IA disease have a recurrence after surgery, suggesting the need to identify patients in this subgroup for more effective therapy. METHODS: We identified gene-expression profiles that predicted the risk of recurrence in a cohort of 89 patients with early-stage NSCLC (the lung metagene model). We evaluated the predictor in two independent groups of 25 patients from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0030 study and 84 patients from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 9761 study. RESULTS: The lung metagene model predicted recurrence for individual patients significantly better than did clinical prognostic factors and was consistent across all early stages of NSCLC. Applied to the cohorts from the ACOSOG Z0030 trial and the CALGB 9761 trial, the lung metagene model had an overall predictive accuracy of 72 percent and 79 percent, respectively. The predictor also identified a subgroup of patients with stage IA disease who were at high risk for recurrence and who might be best treated by adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The lung metagene model provides a potential mechanism to refine the estimation of a patient's risk of disease recurrence and, in principle, to alter decisions regarding the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage NSCLC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa060467This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 576

Metadata

Authors
Potti, A., Mukherjee, S., Petersen, R., Dressman, H. K., Bild, A., Koontz, J., Kratzke, R., Watson, M. A., Kelley, M., Ginsburg, G. S., West, M., Harpole, D. H., & Nevins, J. R.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2006-08-10
Volume
355
Issue
6
Pages
570-580
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2121277505
Cited by
576
References
1
FWCI
49.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Genomic Strategy to Refine Prognosis in Early-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa060467
The paper
Potti, A., Mukherjee, S., Petersen, R., Dressman, H. K., Bild, A., Koontz, J., Kratzke, R., Watson, M. A., Kelley, M., Ginsburg, G. S., West, M., Harpole, D. H., & Nevins, J. R. (2006). A Genomic Strategy to Refine Prognosis in Early-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa060467

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.