Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent anogenital diseases
Abstract
Background A phase 3 trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of a prophylactic quadrivalent vaccine in preventing anogenital diseases associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6, 11, 16, and 18. Methods In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial involving 5455 women between the ages of 16 and 24 years, we assigned 2723 women to receive vaccine and 2732 to receive placebo at day 1, month 2, and month 6. The coprimary composite end points were the incidence of genital warts, vulvar or vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia, or cancer and the incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, adenocarcinoma in situ, or cancer associated with HPV type 6, 11, 16, or 18. Data for the primary analysis were collected for a per-protocol susceptible population of women who had no virologic evidence of HPV type 6, 11, 16, or 18 through 1 month after administration of the third dose. Results The women were followed for an average of 3 years after administration of the first dose. In the per-protocol population, those followed for vulvar, vaginal, or perianal disease included 2261 women (83%) in the vaccine group and 2279 (83%) in the placebo group. Those followed for cervical disease included 2241 women (82%) in the vaccine group and 2258 (83%) in the placebo group. Vaccine efficacy was 100% for each of the coprimary end points. In an intention-to-treat analysis, including those with prevalent infection or disease caused by vaccine-type and non-vaccine-type HPV, vacc…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
HPV vaccines are safe and highly effective against vaccine-type persistent infection and cervical precancerous lesions in women, with vaccine efficacy ≥93%.
“Large international randomised control clinical trials have shown that HPV vaccines are safe and highly effective against vaccine-type persistent infection and cervical precancerous lesions in women (with vaccine efficacy ≥93%).6, 7, 8”
Cites
Solomon, D. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.16.2114 · Cited by 3,104 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brisson, M., Kim, J. J., Canfell, K., Drolet, M., Gingras, G., Burger, E. A., Martin, D., Simms, K. T., Bénard, É., Boily, M.-C., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30068-4 · Cited by 943 · see citing works
Brisson, M., Bénard, É., Drolet, M., Bogaards, J. A., Baussano, I., Vänskä, S., Jit, M., Boily, M.-C., Smith, M. A., Berkhof, J., et al. (2016) · The Lancet Public Health · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(16)30001-9 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Kim, J. J., Andres-Beck, B., & Goldie, S. J. (2007) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604023 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Fesenfeld, M., Hutubessy, R., & Jit, M. (2013) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.06.060 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Paz-Zulueta, M., Álvarez-Paredes, L., Rodríguez Díaz, J. C., Parás-Bravo, P., Andrada Becerra, M. E., Rodríguez Ingelmo, J. M., Ruiz García, M. M., Portilla, J., & Santibañez, M. (2018) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-018-4033-2 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
- Authors
- Garland, S. M., Hernandez-Avila, M., Wheeler, C. M., Perez, G., Harper, D. M., Leodolter, S., Tang, G. W. K., Ferris, D. G., Steben, M., Bryan, J., Taddeo, F. J., Railkar, R., Esser, M. T., Sings, H. L., Nelson, M., Boslego, J., Sattler, C., Barr, E., & Koutsky, L. A.
- Affiliations
- Royal Women's Hospital (AU)
- University of New Mexico (US)
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Medical University of Vienna (AT)
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Augusta University (US)
- Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec (CA)
- University of Washington (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2007-05-10
- Volume
- 356
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 1928-1943
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2126246455
- Cited by
- 1,886
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 80 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 128 · 2014: 126 · 2013: 106 · 2012: 142
- FWCI
- 137.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Genital Health and Disease
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
- Keywords
- quadrivalent HPV vaccine, human papillomavirus, genital warts, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, adenocarcinoma in situ, vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia, vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia, HPV types 6, 11, 16, 18, vaccine efficacy, young women, prophylactic vaccination
- MeSH terms
- Human Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18, Adenocarcinoma, Adolescent, Adult, Carcinoma in Situ, Condylomata Acuminata, DNA, Viral, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Genital Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Papillomavirus Infections, Alphapapillomavirus, Papillomavirus Vaccines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review