Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 805

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prevalence of Rheumatic Heart Disease Detected by Echocardiographic Screening

Open access
Marijon, Eloi, Ou, Phalla, Celermajer, David S., Ferreira, Beatriz, Mocumbi, Ana Olga, Jani, Dinesh, Paquet, Christophe, Jacob, Sophie, Sidi, Daniel, Jouven, Xavier·2007·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies of the prevalence of rheumatic heart disease have used clinical screening with echocardiographic confirmation of suspected cases. We hypothesized that echocardiographic screening of all surveyed children would show a significantly higher prevalence of rheumatic heart disease. METHODS: Randomly selected schoolchildren from 6 through 17 years of age in Cambodia and Mozambique were screened for rheumatic heart disease according to standard clinical and echocardiographic criteria. RESULTS: Clinical examination detected rheumatic heart disease that was confirmed by echocardiography in 8 of 3677 children in Cambodia and 5 of 2170 children in Mozambique; the corresponding prevalence rates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were 2.2 cases per 1000 (95% CI, 0.7 to 3.7) for Cambodia and 2.3 cases per 1000 (95% CI, 0.3 to 4.3) for Mozambique. In contrast, echocardiographic screening detected 79 cases of rheumatic heart disease in Cambodia and 66 cases in Mozambique, corresponding to prevalence rates of 21.5 cases per 1000 (95% CI, 16.8 to 26.2) and 30.4 cases per 1000 (95% CI, 23.2 to 37.6), respectively. The mitral valve was involved in the great majority of cases (87.3% in Cambodia and 98.4% in Mozambique). CONCLUSIONS: Systematic screening with echocardiography, as compared with clinical screening, reveals a much higher prevalence of rheumatic heart disease (approximately 10 times as great). Since rheumatic heart disease frequently has devastating clinical consequences and secondary prevention may be effective after accurate identification of early cases, these results have important public health implications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa065085

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 805

Metadata

Authors
Marijon, E., Ou, P., Celermajer, D. S., Ferreira, B., Mocumbi, A. O., Jani, D., Paquet, C., Jacob, S., Sidi, D., & Jouven, X.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2007-08-02
Volume
357
Issue
5
Pages
470-476
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2152370764
Cited by
805
References
0
FWCI
33.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of Rheumatic Heart Disease Detected by Echocardiographic Screening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa065085
The paper
Marijon, E., Ou, P., Celermajer, D. S., Ferreira, B., Mocumbi, A. O., Jani, D., Paquet, C., Jacob, S., Sidi, D., & Jouven, X. (2007). Prevalence of Rheumatic Heart Disease Detected by Echocardiographic Screening. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa065085

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.