Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 696

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Facilitated PCI in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Open access
Ellis, Stephen G., Tendera, Michal, de Belder, Mark A., van Boven, Ad J., Widimsky, Petr, Janssens, Luc, Andersen, H.R., Betriu, Amadeo, Savonitto, Stefano, Adamus, Jerzy, Peruga, Jan Z., Kosmider, Maciej, Katz, Olivier, Neunteufl, Thomas, Jorgova, Julia, Dorobantu, Maria, Grinfeld, Liliana, Armstrong, Paul, Brodie, Bruce R., Herrmann, Howard C., Montalescot, Gilles, Neumann, Franz-Josef, Effron, Mark B., Barnathan, Elliot S., Topol, Eric J.·2008·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) preceded by early treatment with abciximab plus half-dose reteplase (combination-facilitated PCI) or with abciximab alone (abciximab-facilitated PCI) would improve outcomes in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, as compared with abciximab administered immediately before the procedure (primary PCI). METHODS: In this international, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we randomly assigned patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who presented 6 hours or less after the onset of symptoms to receive combination-facilitated PCI, abciximab-facilitated PCI, or primary PCI. All patients received unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin before PCI and a 12-hour infusion of abciximab after PCI. The primary end point was the composite of death from all causes, ventricular fibrillation occurring more than 48 hours after randomization, cardiogenic shock, and congestive heart failure during the first 90 days after randomization. RESULTS: A total of 2452 patients were randomly assigned to a treatment group. Significantly more patients had early ST-segment resolution with combination-facilitated PCI (43.9%) than with abciximab-facilitated PCI (33.1%) or primary PCI (31.0%; P=0.01 and P=0.003, respectively). The primary end point occurred in 9.8%, 10.5%, and 10.7% of the patients in the combination-facilitated PCI group, abciximab-facilitated PCI group, and primary-PCI group, respectively (P=0.55); 90-day mortality rates were 5.2%, 5.5%, and 4.5%, respectively (P=0.49). CONCLUSIONS: Neither facilitation of PCI with reteplase plus abciximab nor facilitation with abciximab alone significantly improved the clinical outcomes, as compared with abciximab given at the time of PCI, in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00046228 [ClinicalTrials.gov].)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa0706816

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 696

Metadata

Authors
Ellis, S. G., Tendera, M., de Belder, M. A., van Boven, A. J., Widimsky, P., Janssens, L., Andersen, H. R., Betriu, A., Savonitto, S., Adamus, J., Peruga, J. Z., Kosmider, M., Katz, O., Neunteufl, T., Jorgova, J., Dorobantu, M., Grinfeld, L., Armstrong, P., Brodie, B. R., Herrmann, H. C., Montalescot, G., Neumann, F.-J., Effron, M. B., Barnathan, E. S., & Topol, E. J.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2008-05-22
Volume
358
Issue
21
Pages
2205-2217
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2164085712
Cited by
696
References
0
FWCI
67.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Facilitated PCI in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa0706816
The paper
Ellis, S. G., Tendera, M., de Belder, M. A., van Boven, A. J., Widimsky, P., Janssens, L., Andersen, H. R., Betriu, A., Savonitto, S., Adamus, J., Peruga, J. Z., Kosmider, M., Katz, O., Neunteufl, T., Jorgova, J., Dorobantu, M., Grinfeld, L., Armstrong, P., Brodie, B. R., . . . Topol, E. J. (2008). Facilitated PCI in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0706816

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.