Cited by 391Bone health and treatmentsBone health and osteoporosis researchBone Metabolism and Diseases

Giant Osteoclast Formation and Long-Term Oral Bisphosphonate Therapy

Open access
Weinstein, Robert S., Roberson, Paula K., Manolagas, Stavros C.·2009·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates decrease bone resorption and are commonly used to treat or prevent osteoporosis. However, the effect of bisphosphonates on their target cells remains enigmatic, since in patients benefiting from therapy, little change, if any, has been observed in the number of osteoclasts, which are the cells responsible for bone resorption. METHODS: We examined 51 bone-biopsy specimens obtained after a 3-year, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial of oral alendronate to prevent bone resorption among healthy postmenopausal women 40 through 59 years of age. The patients were assigned to one of five groups: those receiving placebo for 3 years; alendronate at a dose of 1, 5, or 10 mg per day for 3 years; or alendronate at a dose of 20 mg per day for 2 years, followed by placebo for 1 year. Formalin-fixed, undecalcified planar sections were assessed by bone histomorphometric methods. RESULTS: The number of osteoclasts was increased by a factor of 2.6 in patients receiving 10 mg of alendronate per day for 3 years as compared with the placebo group (P<0.01). Moreover, the number of osteoclasts increased as the cumulative dose of the drug increased (r=0.50, P<0.001). Twenty-seven percent of these osteoclasts were giant cells with pyknotic nuclei that were adjacent to superficial resorption cavities. Furthermore, giant, hypernucleated, detached osteoclasts with 20 to 40 nuclei were found after alendronate treatment had been discontinued for 1 year. Of these large cells, 20 to 37% were apoptotic, according to both their morphologic features and positive findings from in situ end labeling. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term alendronate treatment is associated with an increase in the number of osteoclasts, which include distinctive giant, hypernucleated, detached osteoclasts that are undergoing protracted apoptosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa0802633

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of distinct giant hypernucleated osteoclasts per se in patients undergoing long-term NBP treatment did not necessarily indicate an increase in osteoclast aggressiveness.

    “The presence of distinct giant hypernucleated osteoclasts per sé in patients undergoing long-term treatment with nitrogen bisphosphonates (NBPs), as discovered by Weinstein et al.155 and confirmed by others,156 did not necessarily indicate an increase in osteoclast aggressiveness.”
  • These osteoclasts showed decreased resorption competency and prolonged apoptosis characteristics.

    “These osteoclasts indeed showed decreased resorption competency and prolonged apoptosis characteristics.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 391

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]Fleisch H Bisphosphonates in bone disease: from the laboratory to the patient 4 San Diego, CA Academic Press 2000 42

Authors
Weinstein, R. S., Roberson, P. K., & Manolagas, S. C.
Affiliations
Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2009-01
Volume
360
Issue
1
Pages
53-62
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2037927763
Cited by
391
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 34
FWCI
17.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 BX000436)
  • National Institute on Aging (P01 AG-13918, P01AG013918)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
Keywords
alendronate, bisphosphonates, osteoclasts, osteoclast apoptosis, bone resorption, osteoporosis prevention, postmenopausal women, long-term drug therapy, bone histomorphometry, drug dose dependence
MeSH terms
Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase, Acid Phosphatase, Adult, Biopsy, Bone and Bones, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Isoenzymes, Middle Aged, Osteoclasts, Linear Models, Bone Remodeling, Apoptosis, Postmenopause, Alendronate, Bone Density Conservation Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review