Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,105

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Early versus Deferred Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV on Survival

Open access
Kitahata, Mari M., Gange, Stephen J., Abraham, Alison G., Merriman, Barry, Saag, Michael S., Justice, Amy C., Hogg, Robert S., Deeks, Steven G., Eron, Joseph J., Brooks, John T., Rourke, Sean B., Gill, M. John, Bosch, Ronald J., Martin, Jeffrey N., Klein, Marina B., Jacobson, Lisa P., Rodriguez, Benigno, Sterling, Timothy R., Kirk, Gregory D., Napravnik, Sonia, Rachlis, Anita R., Calzavara, Liviana M., Horberg, Michael A., Silverberg, Michael J., Gebo, Kelly A., Goedert, James J., Benson, Constance A., Collier, Ann C., Van Rompaey, Stephen E., Crane, Heidi M., McKaig, Rosemary G., Lau, Bryan, Freeman, Aimee M., Moore, Richard D.·2009·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal time for the initiation of antiretroviral therapy for asymptomatic patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is uncertain. METHODS: We conducted two parallel analyses involving a total of 17,517 asymptomatic patients with HIV infection in the United States and Canada who received medical care during the period from 1996 through 2005. None of the patients had undergone previous antiretroviral therapy. In each group, we stratified the patients according to the CD4+ count (351 to 500 cells per cubic millimeter or >500 cells per cubic millimeter) at the initiation of antiretroviral therapy. In each group, we compared the relative risk of death for patients who initiated therapy when the CD4+ count was above each of the two thresholds of interest (early-therapy group) with that of patients who deferred therapy until the CD4+ count fell below these thresholds (deferred-therapy group). RESULTS: In the first analysis, which involved 8362 patients, 2084 (25%) initiated therapy at a CD4+ count of 351 to 500 cells per cubic millimeter, and 6278 (75%) deferred therapy. After adjustment for calendar year, cohort of patients, and demographic and clinical characteristics, among patients in the deferred-therapy group there was an increase in the risk of death of 69%, as compared with that in the early-therapy group (relative risk in the deferred-therapy group, 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26 to 2.26; P<0.001). In the second analysis involving 9155 patients, 2220 (24%) initiated therapy at a CD4+ count of more than 500 cells per cubic millimeter and 6935 (76%) deferred therapy. Among patients in the deferred-therapy group, there was an increase in the risk of death of 94% (relative risk, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.37 to 2.79; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The early initiation of antiretroviral therapy before the CD4+ count fell below two prespecified thresholds significantly improved survival, as compared with deferred therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa0807252

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,105

Metadata

Authors
Kitahata, M. M., Gange, S. J., Abraham, A. G., Merriman, B., Saag, M. S., Justice, A. C., Hogg, R. S., Deeks, S. G., Eron, J. J., Brooks, J. T., Rourke, S. B., Gill, M. J., Bosch, R. J., Martin, J. N., Klein, M. B., Jacobson, L. P., Rodriguez, B., Sterling, T. R., Kirk, G. D., Napravnik, S., Rachlis, A. R., Calzavara, L. M., Horberg, M. A., Silverberg, M. J., Gebo, K. A., Goedert, J. J., Benson, C. A., Collier, A. C., Van Rompaey, S. E., Crane, H. M., McKaig, R. G., Lau, B., Freeman, A. M., & Moore, R. D.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2009-04-30
Volume
360
Issue
18
Pages
1815-1826
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2143265231
Cited by
1,105
References
4
FWCI
100.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.