The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of Ustekinumab and Etanercept for Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Biologic agents offer a range of new therapeutic options for patients with psoriasis; however, the relative benefit-risk profiles of such therapies are not well known. We compared two biologic agents, ustekinumab (an interleukin-12 and interleukin-23 blocker) and etanercept (an inhibitor of tumor necrosis factor alpha), for the treatment of psoriasis. METHODS: We randomly assigned 903 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis to receive subcutaneous injections of either 45 or 90 mg of ustekinumab (at weeks 0 and 4) or high-dose etanercept (50 mg twice weekly for 12 weeks). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with at least 75% improvement in the psoriasis area-and-severity index (PASI) at week 12; a secondary end point was the proportion with cleared or minimal disease on the basis of the physician's global assessment. Assessors were unaware of the treatment assignments. The efficacy and safety of a crossover from etanercept to ustekinumab were evaluated after week 12. RESULTS: There was at least 75% improvement in the PASI at week 12 in 67.5% of patients who received 45 mg of ustekinumab and 73.8% of patients who received 90 mg, as compared with 56.8% of those who received etanercept (P=0.01 and P<0.001, respectively). Similarly, 65.1% of patients who received 45 mg of ustekinumab and 70.6% of patients who received 90 mg of ustekinumab had cleared or minimal disease according to the physician's global assessment, as compared with 49.0% of those who received etanercept (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Among patients who did not have a response to etanercept, 48.9% had at least 75% improvement in the PASI within 12 weeks after crossover to ustekinumab. One or more adverse events occurred through week 12 in 66.0% of patients who received 45 mg of ustekinumab and 69.2% of patients who received 90 mg of ustekinumab and in 70.0% who received etanercept; 1.9%, 1.2%, and 1.2%, respectively, had serious adverse events. Safety patterns were similar before and after crossover from etanercept to ustekinumab. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of ustekinumab at a dose of 45 or 90 mg was superior to that of high-dose etanercept over a 12-week period in patients with psoriasis. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00454584.)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Acosta-Rodriguez, E. V., Napolitani, G., Lanzavecchia, A., & Sallusto, F. (2007) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni1496 · Cited by 1,857
Cited by
Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, and Treatment of Psoriasis: A Review
Armstrong, A. W., & Read, C. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.4006 · Cited by 2,335
Secukinumab in plaque psoriasis—results of two phase 3 trials
Langley, R. G., Elewski, B. E., Lebwohl, M., Reich, K., Griffiths, C. E. M., Papp, K., Puig, L., Nakagawa, H., Spelman, L., Sigurgeirsson, B., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1314258 · Cited by 1,997
Functional Specialization of Interleukin-17 Family Members
Iwakura, Y., Ishigame, H., Saijo, S., & Nakae, S. (2011) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2011.02.012 · Cited by 1,289
Inflammatory bone loss: pathogenesis and therapeutic intervention
Redlich, K., & Smolen, J. S. (2012) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3669 · Cited by 830
Type I/II cytokines, JAKs, and new strategies for treating autoimmune diseases
Schwartz, D. M., Bonelli, M., Gadina, M., & O'Shea, J. J. (2016) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2015.167 · Cited by 648
Metadata
- Authors
- Griffiths, C. E. M., Strober, B. E., van de Kerkhof, P., Ho, V., Fidelus-Gort, R., Yeilding, N., Guzzo, C., Xia, Y., Zhou, B., Li, S., Dooley, L. T., Goldstein, N. H., & Menter, A.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2010-01-14
- Volume
- 362
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 118-128
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2149566497
- Cited by
- 859
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Ustekinumab and Etanercept for Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa0810652
- The paper
- Griffiths, C. E. M., Strober, B. E., van de Kerkhof, P., Ho, V., Fidelus-Gort, R., Yeilding, N., Guzzo, C., Xia, Y., Zhou, B., Li, S., Dooley, L. T., Goldstein, N. H., & Menter, A. (2010). Comparison of Ustekinumab and Etanercept for Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0810652
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.