Cited by 690Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation

Defibrillator implantation early after myocardial infarction

Open access
Steinbeck, Gerhard, Andresen, Dietrich, Seidl, Karlheinz, Brachmann, Johannes, Hoffmann, Ellen, Wojciechowski, Dariusz, Kornacewicz-Jach, Zdzisława, Sredniawa, Beata +7 more·2009·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rate of death, including sudden cardiac death, is highest early after a myocardial infarction. Yet current guidelines do not recommend the use of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) within 40 days after a myocardial infarction for the prevention of sudden cardiac death. We tested the hypothesis that patients at increased risk who are treated early with an ICD will live longer than those who receive optimal medical therapy alone. METHODS: This randomized, prospective, open-label, investigator-initiated, multicenter trial registered 62,944 unselected patients with myocardial infarction. Of this total, 898 patients were enrolled 5 to 31 days after the event if they met certain clinical criteria: a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (< or = 40%) and a heart rate of 90 or more beats per minute on the first available electrocardiogram (ECG) (criterion 1: 602 patients), nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (> or = 150 beats per minute) during Holter monitoring (criterion 2: 208 patients), or both criteria (88 patients). Of the 898 patients, 445 were randomly assigned to treatment with an ICD and 453 to medical therapy alone. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 37 months, 233 patients died: 116 patients in the ICD group and 117 patients in the control group. Overall mortality was not reduced in the ICD group (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 1.35; P=0.78). There were fewer sudden cardiac deaths in the ICD group than in the control group (27 vs. 60; hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31 to 1.00; P=0.049), but the number of nonsudden cardiac deaths was higher (68 vs. 39; hazard ratio, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.29 to 2.84; P=0.001). Hazard ratios were similar among the three groups of patients categorized according to the enrollment criteria they met (criterion 1, criterion 2, or both). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic ICD therapy did not reduce overall mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and clinical features that placed them at increased risk. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00157768.)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa0901889

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Randomized trials in patients stratified for ICD implantation based on HRV failed to demonstrate the usefulness of HRV in predicting benefit from ICD therapy.

    “Despite data linking decreased HRV with increased mortality, randomized trials in patients stratified for ICD implantation based on this parameter failed to demonstrate the usefulness of HRV in predicting benefit from ICD therapy (Hohnloser et al., 2004;Steinbeck et al., 2009).”

    From 2017 ISHNE-HRS expert consensus statement on ambulatory ECG and external cardiac monitoring/telemetry (2017) · cites this paper as Steinbeck et al., 2009

    The Results and Discussion (page not provided) report that the randomized IRIS trial found no overall survival benefit from early ICD implantation. But patients were selected using admission heart rate, LVEF, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia—not heart rate variability (HRV). This trial therefore does not establish whether HRV predicts benefit from ICD therapy. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 690

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [17]17. mann T, et al. Risk stratification follow- ing myocardial infarction in the throm- bolytic era: a two-step strategy using noninvasive and invasive methods. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:131-8.
  2. [20]20. Steinbeck G, Andresen D, Senges J, 17. Hoffmann E, Seidl KH, Brachmann J. Im- mediate Risk-Stratification Improves Sur- vival (IRIS): study protocol. Europace 2004; 6:392-9.
  3. [32]32. Rosenbaum DS, Jackson LE, Smith 30. JM, Garan H, Ruskin JN, Cohen RJ. Elec- trical alternans and vulnerability to ven- tricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med 1994; 330:235-41.

Authors
Steinbeck, G., Andresen, D., Seidl, K., Brachmann, J., Hoffmann, E., Wojciechowski, D., Kornacewicz-Jach, Z., Sredniawa, B., Lupkovics, G., Hofgärtner, F., Lubinski, A., Rosenqvist, M., Habets, A., Wegscheider, K., & Senges, J.
Affiliations
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Klinikum Ludwigshafen (DE)
  • Klinikum Coburg (DE)
  • München Klinik Bogenhausen (DE)
  • Kistarcsai Flór Ferenc Kórház (HU)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Medtronic (Netherlands) (NL)
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2009-10-08
Volume
361
Issue
15
Pages
1427-1436
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2008188455
Cited by
690
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 58
FWCI
37.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Debrecen Electronic Archive (University of Debrecen) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • AstraZeneca
  • Boston Scientific Corporation
  • St. Jude Medical
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Keywords
implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, myocardial infarction, sudden cardiac death, all-cause mortality, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, medical therapy, risk stratification, primary prevention of sudden cardiac death, Holter monitoring
MeSH terms
Aged, Cause of Death, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Registries, Risk, Time Factors, Survival Rate, Proportional Hazards Models, Death, Sudden, Cardiac, Defibrillators, Implantable

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review