Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 492

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection in Children

Open access
Craig, Jonathan C., Simpson, Judy M., Williams, Gabrielle J., Lowe, Alison, Reynolds, Graham J., McTaggart, Steven J., Hodson, Elisabeth M., Carapetis, Jonathan R., Cranswick, Noel E., Smith, Grahame, Irwig, Les M., Caldwell, Patrina H.Y., Hamilton, Sana, Roy, Leslie P.·2009·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antibiotics are widely administered to children with the intention of preventing urinary tract infection, but adequately powered, placebo-controlled trials regarding efficacy are lacking. This study from four Australian centers examined whether low-dose, continuous oral antibiotic therapy prevents urinary tract infection in predisposed children. METHODS: We randomly assigned children under the age of 18 years who had had one or more microbiologically proven urinary tract infections to receive either daily trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole suspension (as 2 mg of trimethoprim plus 10 mg of sulfamethoxazole per kilogram of body weight) or placebo for 12 months. The primary outcome was microbiologically confirmed symptomatic urinary tract infection. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed with the use of time-to-event data. RESULTS: From December 1998 to March 2007, a total of 576 children (of 780 planned) underwent randomization. The median age at entry was 14 months; 64% of the patients were girls, 42% had known vesicoureteral reflux (at least grade III in 53% of these patients), and 71% were enrolled after the first diagnosis of urinary tract infection. During the study, urinary tract infection developed in 36 of 288 patients (13%) in the group receiving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (antibiotic group) and in 55 of 288 patients (19%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio in the antibiotic group, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.40 to 0.93; P = 0.02 by the log-rank test). In the antibiotic group, the reduction in the absolute risk of urinary tract infection (6 percentage points) appeared to be consistent across all subgroups of patients (P > or = 0.20 for all interactions). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term, low-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was associated with a decreased number of urinary tract infections in predisposed children. The treatment effect appeared to be consistent but modest across subgroups. (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12608000470392.)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa0902295

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 492

Metadata

Authors
Craig, J. C., Simpson, J. M., Williams, G. J., Lowe, A., Reynolds, G. J., McTaggart, S. J., Hodson, E. M., Carapetis, J. R., Cranswick, N. E., Smith, G., Irwig, L. M., Caldwell, P. H. Y., Hamilton, S., & Roy, L. P.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2009-10-29
Volume
361
Issue
18
Pages
1748-1759
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2082988422
Cited by
492
References
0
FWCI
27.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection in Children. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa0902295
The paper
Craig, J. C., Simpson, J. M., Williams, G. J., Lowe, A., Reynolds, G. J., McTaggart, S. J., Hodson, E. M., Carapetis, J. R., Cranswick, N. E., Smith, G., Irwig, L. M., Caldwell, P. H. Y., Hamilton, S., & Roy, L. P. (2009). Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection in Children. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0902295

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.