The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anthracycline Dose Intensification in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: In young adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), intensification of the anthracycline dose during induction therapy has improved the rate of complete remission but not of overall survival. We evaluated the use of cytarabine plus either standard-dose or high-dose daunorubicin as induction therapy, followed by intensive consolidation therapy, in inducing complete remission to improve overall survival. METHODS: In this phase 3 randomized trial, we assigned 657 patients between the ages of 17 and 60 years who had untreated AML to receive three once-daily doses of daunorubicin at either the standard dose (45 mg per square meter of body-surface area) or a high dose (90 mg per square meter), combined with seven daily doses of cytarabine (100 mg per square meter) by continuous intravenous infusion. Patients who had a complete remission were offered either allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation or high-dose cytarabine, with or without a single dose of the monoclonal antibody gemtuzumab ozogamicin, followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, high-dose daunorubicin, as compared with a standard dose of the drug, resulted in a higher rate of complete remission (70.6% vs. 57.3%, P<0.001) and improved overall survival (median, 23.7 vs. 15.7 months; P=0.003). The rates of serious adverse events were similar in the two groups. Median follow-up was 25.2 months. CONCLUSIONS: In young adults with AML, intensifying induction therapy with a high daily dose of daunorubicin improved the rate of complete remission and the duration of overall survival, as compared with the standard dose. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00049517.)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Figueroa, M. E., Abdel-Wahab, O., Lu, C., Ward, P. S., Patel, J., Shih, A., Li, Y., Bhagwat, N., Vasanthakumar, A., Fernandez, H. F., et al. (2010) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2010.11.015 · Cited by 2,766
Self-citation‘Acute myeloid leukemia: a comprehensive review and 2016 update’
De Kouchkovsky, I., & Abdul-Hay, M. (2016) · Blood Cancer Journal · doi:10.1038/bcj.2016.50 · Cited by 1,317
Gamis, A. S., Alonzo, T. A., Meshinchi, S., Sung, L., Gerbing, R. B., Raimondi, S. C., Hirsch, B. A., Kahwash, S. B., Heerema-McKenney, A., Winter, L., et al. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.55.3628 · Cited by 486
Burnett, A. K., Russell, N. H., Hills, R. K., Kell, J., Freeman, S., Kjeldsen, L., Hunter, A. E., Yin, J., Craddock, C. F., Dufva, I. H., et al. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.42.2964 · Cited by 409
Acute myeloid leukemia in the real world: why population-based registries are needed
Juliusson, G., Lazarevic, V., Hörstedt, A.-S., Hagberg, O., & Höglund, M. (2012) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2011-12-379008 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Fernandez, H. F., Sun, Z., Yao, X., Litzow, M. R., Luger, S. M., Paietta, E. M., Racevskis, J., Dewald, G. W., Ketterling, R. P., Bennett, J. M., Rowe, J. M., Lazarus, H. M., & Tallman, M. S.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2009-09-24
- Volume
- 361
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1249-1259
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2069448515
- Cited by
- 919
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anthracycline Dose Intensification in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa0904544
- The paper
- Fernandez, H. F., Sun, Z., Yao, X., Litzow, M. R., Luger, S. M., Paietta, E. M., Racevskis, J., Dewald, G. W., Ketterling, R. P., Bennett, J. M., Rowe, J. M., Lazarus, H. M., & Tallman, M. S. (2009). Anthracycline Dose Intensification in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0904544
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.