Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 666

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Timing of Initiation of Antiretroviral Drugs during Tuberculosis Therapy

Open access
Abdool Karim, Salim S., Naidoo, Kogieleum, Grobler, Anneke, Padayatchi, Nesri, Baxter, Cheryl, Gray, Andrew, Gengiah, Tanuja, Nair, Gonasagrie, Bamber, Sheila, Singh, Aarthi, Khan, Munira, Pienaar, Jacqueline, El-Sadr, Wafaa, Friedland, Gerald, Abdool Karim, Quarraisha·2010·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rates of death are high among patients with coinfection with tuberculosis and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The optimal timing for the initiation of antiretroviral therapy in relation to tuberculosis therapy remains controversial. METHODS: In an open-label, randomized, controlled trial in Durban, South Africa, we assigned 642 patients with both tuberculosis and HIV infection to start antiretroviral therapy either during tuberculosis therapy (in two integrated-therapy groups) or after the completion of such treatment (in one sequential-therapy group). The diagnosis of tuberculosis was based on a positive sputum smear for acid-fast bacilli. Only patients with HIV infection and a CD4+ cell count of less than 500 per cubic millimeter were included. All patients received standard tuberculosis therapy, prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and a once-daily antiretroviral regimen of didanosine, lamivudine, and efavirenz. The primary end point was death from any cause. RESULTS: This analysis compares data from the sequential-therapy group and the combined integrated-therapy groups up to September 1, 2008, when the data and safety monitoring committee recommended that all patients receive integrated antiretroviral therapy. There was a reduction in the rate of death among the 429 patients in the combined integrated-therapy groups (5.4 deaths per 100 person-years, or 25 deaths), as compared with the 213 patients in the sequential-therapy group (12.1 per 100 person-years, or 27 deaths); a relative reduction of 56% (hazard ratio in the combined integrated-therapy groups, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.25 to 0.79; P=0.003). Mortality was lower in the combined integrated-therapy groups in all CD4+ count strata. Rates of adverse events during follow-up were similar in the two study groups. CONCLUSIONS: The initiation of antiretroviral therapy during tuberculosis therapy significantly improved survival and provides further impetus for the integration of tuberculosis and HIV services. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00398996.)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa0905848

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 666

Metadata

Authors
Abdool Karim, S. S., Naidoo, K., Grobler, A., Padayatchi, N., Baxter, C., Gray, A., Gengiah, T., Nair, G., Bamber, S., Singh, A., Khan, M., Pienaar, J., El-Sadr, W., Friedland, G., & Abdool Karim, Q.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2010-02-25
Volume
362
Issue
8
Pages
697-706
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2163899436
Cited by
666
References
0
FWCI
63.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Timing of Initiation of Antiretroviral Drugs during Tuberculosis Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa0905848
The paper
Abdool Karim, S. S., Naidoo, K., Grobler, A., Padayatchi, N., Baxter, C., Gray, A., Gengiah, T., Nair, G., Bamber, S., Singh, A., Khan, M., Pienaar, J., El-Sadr, W., Friedland, G., & Abdool Karim, Q. (2010). Timing of Initiation of Antiretroviral Drugs during Tuberculosis Therapy. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0905848

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.