Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,583

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dabigatran versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism

Open access
Schulman, Sam, Kearon, Clive, Kakkar, Ajay K., Mismetti, Patrick, Schellong, Sebastian, Eriksson, Henry, Baanstra, David, Schnee, Janet, Goldhaber, Samuel Z.·2009·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The direct oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran has a predictable anticoagulant effect and may be an alternative therapy to warfarin for patients who have acute venous thromboembolism. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial involving patients with acute venous thromboembolism who were initially given parenteral anticoagulation therapy for a median of 9 days (interquartile range, 8 to 11), we compared oral dabigatran, administered at a dose of 150 mg twice daily, with warfarin that was dose-adjusted to achieve an international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0. The primary outcome was the 6-month incidence of recurrent symptomatic, objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism and related deaths. Safety end points included bleeding events, acute coronary syndromes, other adverse events, and results of liver-function tests. RESULTS: A total of 30 of the 1274 patients randomly assigned to receive dabigatran (2.4%), as compared with 27 of the 1265 patients randomly assigned to warfarin (2.1%), had recurrent venous thromboembolism; the difference in risk was 0.4 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.8 to 1.5; P<0.001 for the prespecified noninferiority margin). The hazard ratio with dabigatran was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.84). Major bleeding episodes occurred in 20 patients assigned to dabigatran (1.6%) and in 24 patients assigned to warfarin (1.9%) (hazard ratio with dabigatran, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.45 to 1.48), and episodes of any bleeding were observed in 205 patients assigned to dabigatran (16.1%) and 277 patients assigned to warfarin (21.9%; hazard ratio with dabigatran, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.85). The numbers of deaths, acute coronary syndromes, and abnormal liver-function tests were similar in the two groups. Adverse events leading to discontinuation of the study drug occurred in 9.0% of patients assigned to dabigatran and in 6.8% of patients assigned to warfarin (P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism, a fixed dose of dabigatran is as effective as warfarin, has a safety profile that is similar to that of warfarin, and does not require laboratory monitoring. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00291330.)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa0906598

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Oger E, 2000, Thromb Haemost, 83, 657, 10.1055/s-0037-1613887 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00458.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1378/chest.08-0658 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1378/chest.08-0670 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1592/phco.28.11.1354 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02748.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61445-7 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01204.x · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1985.tb06125.x · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1985.tb03261.x · DOI
  11. 10.1056/NEJM199506223322501 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/clpt.2009.98 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03075.x · DOI
  14. Gould MK, 1999, Ann Intern Med, 130, 789, 10.7326/0003-4819-130-10-199905180-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1001/archinte.151.10.1944 · DOI
  16. 10.1001/jama.293.6.681 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1056/NEJMoa030104 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.06.034 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)91431-5 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1056/NEJM199005033221802 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 2,583

Metadata

Authors
Schulman, S., Kearon, C., Kakkar, A. K., Mismetti, P., Schellong, S., Eriksson, H., Baanstra, D., Schnee, J., & Goldhaber, S. Z.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2009-12-10
Volume
361
Issue
24
Pages
2342-2352
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2118092611
Cited by
2,583
References
2
FWCI
107.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dabigatran versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa0906598
The paper
Schulman, S., Kearon, C., Kakkar, A. K., Mismetti, P., Schellong, S., Eriksson, H., Baanstra, D., Schnee, J., & Goldhaber, S. Z. (2009). Dabigatran versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0906598

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.