The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Semuloparin for Thromboprophylaxis in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy for Cancer
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism. Limited data support the clinical benefit of antithrombotic prophylaxis. METHODS: In this double-blind, multicenter trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the ultra-low-molecular-weight heparin semuloparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer. Patients with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors who were beginning to receive a course of chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous semuloparin, 20 mg once daily, or placebo until there was a change of chemotherapy regimen. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of any symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis, any nonfatal pulmonary embolism, and death related to venous thromboembolism. Clinically relevant bleeding (major and nonmajor) was the main safety outcome. RESULTS: The median treatment duration was 3.5 months. Venous thromboembolism occurred in 20 of 1608 patients (1.2%) receiving semuloparin, as compared with 55 of 1604 (3.4%) receiving placebo (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21 to 0.60; P<0.001), with consistent efficacy among subgroups defined according to the origin and stage of cancer and the baseline risk of venous thromboembolism. The incidence of clinically relevant bleeding was 2.8% and 2.0% in the semuloparin and placebo groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.89 to 2.21). Major bleeding occurred in 19 of 1589 patients (1.2%) receiving semuloparin and 18 of 1583 (1.1%) receiving placebo (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.99). Incidences of all other adverse events were similar in the two study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Semuloparin reduces the incidence of thromboembolic events in patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer, with no apparent increase in major bleeding. (Funded by Sanofi; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00694382.).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk
Fine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1999.10474144 · Cited by 14,290
An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance
SIMES, R. J. (1986) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/73.3.751 · Cited by 2,396
Cited by
Biomarkers for prediction of venous thromboembolism in cancer
Pabinger, I., Thaler, J., & Ay, C. (2013) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2013-04-460147 · Cited by 256
Young, A., Chapman, O., Connor, C., Poole, C., Rose, P., & Kakkar, A. K. (2012) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.106 · Cited by 150
Self-citationKirtane, A. R., Sadhukha, T., Kim, H., Khanna, V., Koniar, B., & Panyam, J. (2017) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-1646 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Agnelli, G., George, D. J., Kakkar, A. K., Fisher, W., Lassen, M. R., Mismetti, P., Mouret, P., Chaudhari, U., Lawson, F., & Turpie, A. G. G.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2012-02-16
- Volume
- 366
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 601-609
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2041113507
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 36.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Semuloparin for Thromboprophylaxis in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy for Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1108898
- The paper
- Agnelli, G., George, D. J., Kakkar, A. K., Fisher, W., Lassen, M. R., Mismetti, P., Mouret, P., Chaudhari, U., Lawson, F., & Turpie, A. G. G. (2012). Semuloparin for Thromboprophylaxis in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy for Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1108898
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.