Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 945

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tofacitinib or Adalimumab versus Placebo in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Open access
van Vollenhoven, Ronald F., Fleischmann, Roy, Cohen, Stanley, Lee, Eun Bong, García Meijide, Juan A., Wagner, Sylke, Forejtova, Sarka, Zwillich, Samuel H., Gruben, David, Koncz, Tamas, Wallenstein, Gene V., Krishnaswami, Sriram, Bradley, John D., Wilkinson, Bethanie·2012·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) is a novel oral Janus kinase inhibitor that is being investigated for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: In this 12-month, phase 3 trial, 717 patients who were receiving stable doses of methotrexate were randomly assigned to 5 mg of tofacitinib twice daily, 10 mg of tofacitinib twice daily, 40 mg of adalimumab once every 2 weeks, or placebo. At month 3, patients in the placebo group who did not have a 20% reduction from baseline in the number of swollen and tender joints were switched in a blinded fashion to either 5 mg or 10 mg of tofacitinib twice daily; at month 6, all patients still receiving placebo were switched to tofacitinib in a blinded fashion. The three primary outcome measures were a 20% improvement at month 6 in the American College of Rheumatology scale (ACR 20); the change from baseline to month 3 in the score on the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (which ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater disability); and the percentage of patients at month 6 who had a Disease Activity Score for 28-joint counts based on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-4[ESR]) of less than 2.6 (with scores ranging from 0 to 9.4 and higher scores indicating greater disease activity). RESULTS: At month 6, ACR 20 response rates were higher among patients receiving 5 mg or 10 mg of tofacitinib (51.5% and 52.6%, respectively) and among those receiving adalimumab (47.2%) than among those receiving placebo (28.3%) (P<0.001 for all comparisons). There were also greater reductions in the HAQ-DI score at month 3 and higher percentages of patients with a DAS28-4(ESR) below 2.6 at month 6 in the active-treatment groups than in the placebo group. Adverse events occurred more frequently with tofacitinib than with placebo, and pulmonary tuberculosis developed in two patients in the 10-mg tofacitinib group. Tofacitinib was associated with an increase in both low-density and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and with reductions in neutrophil counts. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving background methotrexate, tofacitinib was significantly superior to placebo and was numerically similar to adalimumab in efficacy. (Funded by Pfizer; ORAL Standard ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00853385.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1112072

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 945

Metadata

Authors
van Vollenhoven, R. F., Fleischmann, R., Cohen, S., Lee, E. B., García Meijide, J. A., Wagner, S., Forejtova, S., Zwillich, S. H., Gruben, D., Koncz, T., Wallenstein, G. V., Krishnaswami, S., Bradley, J. D., & Wilkinson, B.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2012-08-09
Volume
367
Issue
6
Pages
508-519
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2069302785
Cited by
945
References
0
FWCI
51.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tofacitinib or Adalimumab versus Placebo in Rheumatoid Arthritis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1112072
The paper
van Vollenhoven, R. F., Fleischmann, R., Cohen, S., Lee, E. B., García Meijide, J. A., Wagner, S., Forejtova, S., Zwillich, S. H., Gruben, D., Koncz, T., Wallenstein, G. V., Krishnaswami, S., Bradley, J. D., & Wilkinson, B. (2012). Tofacitinib or Adalimumab versus Placebo in Rheumatoid Arthritis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1112072

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.