Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,324

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Albumin Replacement in Patients with Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock

Open access
Caironi, Pietro, Tognoni, Gianni, Masson, Serge, Fumagalli, Roberto, Pesenti, Antonio, Romero, Marilena, Fanizza, Caterina, Caspani, Luisa, Faenza, Stefano, Grasselli, Giacomo, Iapichino, Gaetano, Antonelli, Massimo, Parrini, Vieri, Fiore, Gilberto, Latini, Roberto, Gattinoni, Luciano·2014·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although previous studies have suggested the potential advantages of albumin administration in patients with severe sepsis, its efficacy has not been fully established. METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label trial, we randomly assigned 1818 patients with severe sepsis, in 100 intensive care units (ICUs), to receive either 20% albumin and crystalloid solution or crystalloid solution alone. In the albumin group, the target serum albumin concentration was 30 g per liter or more until discharge from the ICU or 28 days after randomization. The primary outcome was death from any cause at 28 days. Secondary outcomes were death from any cause at 90 days, the number of patients with organ dysfunction and the degree of dysfunction, and length of stay in the ICU and the hospital. RESULTS: During the first 7 days, patients in the albumin group, as compared with those in the crystalloid group, had a higher mean arterial pressure (P=0.03) and lower net fluid balance (P<0.001). The total daily amount of administered fluid did not differ significantly between the two groups (P=0.10). At 28 days, 285 of 895 patients (31.8%) in the albumin group and 288 of 900 (32.0%) in the crystalloid group had died (relative risk in the albumin group, 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.14; P=0.94). At 90 days, 365 of 888 patients (41.1%) in the albumin group and 389 of 893 (43.6%) in the crystalloid group had died (relative risk, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.05; P=0.29). No significant differences in other secondary outcomes were observed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe sepsis, albumin replacement in addition to crystalloids, as compared with crystalloids alone, did not improve the rate of survival at 28 and 90 days. (Funded by the Italian Medicines Agency; ALBIOS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00707122.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1305727

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 1,324

Metadata

Authors
Caironi, P., Tognoni, G., Masson, S., Fumagalli, R., Pesenti, A., Romero, M., Fanizza, C., Caspani, L., Faenza, S., Grasselli, G., Iapichino, G., Antonelli, M., Parrini, V., Fiore, G., Latini, R., & Gattinoni, L.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2014-04-10
Volume
370
Issue
15
Pages
1412-1421
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2103727400
Cited by
1,324
References
4
FWCI
90.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Albumin Replacement in Patients with Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1305727
The paper
Caironi, P., Tognoni, G., Masson, S., Fumagalli, R., Pesenti, A., Romero, M., Fanizza, C., Caspani, L., Faenza, S., Grasselli, G., Iapichino, G., Antonelli, M., Parrini, V., Fiore, G., Latini, R., & Gattinoni, L. (2014). Albumin Replacement in Patients with Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1305727

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.