Cited by 339Pancreatitis Pathology and TreatmentClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyGallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders

Early versus On-Demand Nasoenteric Tube Feeding in Acute Pancreatitis

Open access
Bakker, Olaf J., van Brunschot, Sandra, van Santvoort, Hjalmar C., Besselink, Marc G., Bollen, Thomas L., Boermeester, Marja A., Dejong, Cornelis H., van Goor, Harry +23 more·2014·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early enteral feeding through a nasoenteric feeding tube is often used in patients with severe acute pancreatitis to prevent gut-derived infections, but evidence to support this strategy is limited. We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial comparing early nasoenteric tube feeding with an oral diet at 72 hours after presentation to the emergency department in patients with acute pancreatitis. METHODS: We enrolled patients with acute pancreatitis who were at high risk for complications on the basis of an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of 8 or higher (on a scale of 0 to 71, with higher scores indicating more severe disease), an Imrie or modified Glasgow score of 3 or higher (on a scale of 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating more severe disease), or a serum C-reactive protein level of more than 150 mg per liter. Patients were randomly assigned to nasoenteric tube feeding within 24 hours after randomization (early group) or to an oral diet initiated 72 hours after presentation (on-demand group), with tube feeding provided if the oral diet was not tolerated. The primary end point was a composite of major infection (infected pancreatic necrosis, bacteremia, or pneumonia) or death during 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 208 patients were enrolled at 19 Dutch hospitals. The primary end point occurred in 30 of 101 patients (30%) in the early group and in 28 of 104 (27%) in the on-demand group (risk ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.79 to 1.44; P=0.76). There were no significant differences between the early group and the on-demand group in the rate of major infection (25% and 26%, respectively; P=0.87) or death (11% and 7%, respectively; P=0.33). In the on-demand group, 72 patients (69%) tolerated an oral diet and did not require tube feeding. CONCLUSIONS: This trial did not show the superiority of early nasoenteric tube feeding, as compared with an oral diet after 72 hours, in reducing the rate of infection or death in patients with acute pancreatitis at high risk for complications. (Funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development and others; PYTHON Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN18170985.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1404393

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In comparing early enteral nutrition versus delayed enteral nutrition, results showed reduction of infectious complications in early enteral nutrition (RR 0.76, CI 0.59, 0.97, p<0.03).

    “In comparing early EN vs delayed EN (including six studies in ICU patients (51,52,53,54,55,56) and four studies including non-ICU patients (57,58,59,60)), and similar to an earlier metaanalysis (15), our results showed reduction of infectious complications in early EN (RR 0.76, CI 0.59, 0.97, p<0.03).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 339

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [6]6. Whitcomb DC. Acute pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2142-50.
  2. [29]29. Mirtallo JM, Forbes A, McClave SA, Jensen GL, Waitzberg DL, Davies AR. Inter- national consensus guidelines for nutri- tion therapy in pancreatitis. JPEN J Par- enter Enteral Nutr 2012;36:284-91.

Authors
Bakker, O. J., van Brunschot, S., van Santvoort, H. C., Besselink, M. G., Bollen, T. L., Boermeester, M. A., Dejong, C. H., van Goor, H., Bosscha, K., Ali, U. A., Bouwense, S., van Grevenstein, W. M., Heisterkamp, J., Houdijk, A. P., Jansen, J. M., Karsten, T. M., Manusama, E. R., Nieuwenhuijs, V. B., Schaapherder, A. F., van der Schelling, G. P., Schwartz, M. P., Spanier, B. W. M., Tan, A., Vecht, J., Weusten, B. L., Witteman, B. J., Akkermans, L. M., Bruno, M. J., Dijkgraaf, M. G., van Ramshorst, B., & Gooszen, H. G.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
  • Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis (NL)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis (NL)
  • Medisch Centrum Alkmaar (NL)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Reinier de Graaf Hospital (NL)
  • Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Meander Medisch Centrum (NL)
  • Rijnstate Hospital (NL)
  • Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis (NL)
  • Isala (NL)
  • Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei (NL)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2014-11-20
Volume
371
Issue
21
Pages
1983-1993
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2117435626
Cited by
339
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 22 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
24.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
ZonMw
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Keywords
early enteral nutrition, acute pancreatitis, serious infections, mortality, infected pancreatic necrosis, bacteremia, pneumonia, APACHE II score, C-reactive protein, feeding tolerance, emergency department presentation
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Aged, Energy Intake, Enteral Nutrition, Female, Humans, Infections, Intubation, Gastrointestinal, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatitis, Time Factors, APACHE, Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review