The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Recombinant Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Ebola Vaccine
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The worst Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak in history has resulted in more than 28,000 cases and 11,000 deaths. We present the final results of two phase 1 trials of an attenuated, replication-competent, recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (rVSV)-based vaccine candidate designed to prevent EVD. METHODS: We conducted two phase 1, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-escalation trials of an rVSV-based vaccine candidate expressing the glycoprotein of a Zaire strain of Ebola virus (ZEBOV). A total of 39 adults at each site (78 participants in all) were consecutively enrolled into groups of 13. At each site, volunteers received one of three doses of the rVSV-ZEBOV vaccine (3 million plaque-forming units [PFU], 20 million PFU, or 100 million PFU) or placebo. Volunteers at one of the sites received a second dose at day 28. Safety and immunogenicity were assessed. RESULTS: The most common adverse events were injection-site pain, fatigue, myalgia, and headache. Transient rVSV viremia was noted in all the vaccine recipients after dose 1. The rates of adverse events and viremia were lower after the second dose than after the first dose. By day 28, all the vaccine recipients had seroconversion as assessed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) against the glycoprotein of the ZEBOV-Kikwit strain. At day 28, geometric mean titers of antibodies against ZEBOV glycoprotein were higher in the groups that received 20 million PFU or 100 million PFU than in the group that received 3 million PFU, as assessed by ELISA and by pseudovirion neutralization assay. A second dose at 28 days after dose 1 significantly increased antibody titers at day 56, but the effect was diminished at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: This Ebola vaccine candidate elicited anti-Ebola antibody responses. After vaccination, rVSV viremia occurred frequently but was transient. These results support further evaluation of the vaccine dose of 20 million PFU for preexposure prophylaxis and suggest that a second dose may boost antibody responses. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; rVSV∆G-ZEBOV-GP ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02269423 and NCT02280408 .).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A monovalent chimpanzee adenovirus Ebola vaccine boosted with MVA
Ewer, K., Rampling, T., Venkatraman, N., Bowyer, G., Wright, D., Lambe, T., Imoukhuede, E. B., Payne, R., Fehling, S. K., Strecker, T., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1411627 · Cited by 348
Self-citation
Cited by
RNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccine BNT162b2 Selected for a Pivotal Efficacy Study
Walsh, E. E., Frenck, R., Falsey, A. R., Kitchin, N., Absalon, J., Gurtman, A., Lockhart, S., Neuzil, K., Mulligan, M. J., Bailey, R., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.08.17.20176651 · Cited by 2,615
Mulligan, M. J., Lyke, K. E., Kitchin, N., Absalon, J., Gurtman, A., Lockhart, S., Neuzil, K., Raabe, V., Bailey, R., Swanson, K. A., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.06.30.20142570 · Cited by 1,569
New Vaccine Technologies to Combat Outbreak Situations
Rauch, S., Jasny, E., Schmidt, K. E., & Petsch, B. (2018) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.01963 · Cited by 579
A monovalent chimpanzee adenovirus Ebola vaccine boosted with MVA
Ewer, K., Rampling, T., Venkatraman, N., Bowyer, G., Wright, D., Lambe, T., Imoukhuede, E. B., Payne, R., Fehling, S. K., Strecker, T., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1411627 · Cited by 348
Self-citationHuttner, A., Dayer, J.-A., Yerly, S., Combescure, C., Auderset, F., Desmeules, J., Eickmann, M., Finckh, A., Goncalves, A. R., Hooper, J. W., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(15)00154-1 · Cited by 272
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Regules, J. A., Beigel, J. H., Paolino, K. M., Voell, J., Castellano, A. R., Hu, Z., Muñoz, P., Moon, J. E., Ruck, R. C., Bennett, J. W., Twomey, P. S., Gutiérrez, R. L., Remich, S. A., Hack, H. R., Wisniewski, M. L., Josleyn, M. D., Kwilas, S. A., Van Deusen, N., Mbaya, O. T., Zhou, Y., Stanley, D. A., Jing, W., Smith, K. S., Shi, M., Ledgerwood, J. E., Graham, B. S., Sullivan, N. J., Jagodzinski, L. L., Peel, S. A., Alimonti, J. B., Hooper, J. W., Silvera, P. M., Martin, B. K., Monath, T. P., Ramsey, W. J., Link, C. J., Lane, H. C., Michael, N. L., Davey, R. T., & Thomas, S. J.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2017-01-26
- Volume
- 376
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 330-341
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2152076520
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 39.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Recombinant Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Ebola Vaccine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1414216
- The paper
- Regules, J. A., Beigel, J. H., Paolino, K. M., Voell, J., Castellano, A. R., Hu, Z., Muñoz, P., Moon, J. E., Ruck, R. C., Bennett, J. W., Twomey, P. S., Gutiérrez, R. L., Remich, S. A., Hack, H. R., Wisniewski, M. L., Josleyn, M. D., Kwilas, S. A., Van Deusen, N., Mbaya, O. T., . . . Thomas, S. J. (2017). A Recombinant Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Ebola Vaccine. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1414216
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.