Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,065

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Genetic Evolution of Melanoma from Precursor Lesions

Open access
Shain, A. Hunter, Yeh, Iwei, Kovalyshyn, Ivanka, Sriharan, Aravindhan, Talevich, Eric, Gagnon, Alexander, Dummer, Reinhard, North, Jeffrey, Pincus, Laura, Ruben, Beth, Rickaby, William, D’Arrigo, Corrado, Robson, Alistair, Bastian, Boris C.·2015·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The pathogenic mutations in melanoma have been largely catalogued; however, the order of their occurrence is not known. METHODS: We sequenced 293 cancer-relevant genes in 150 areas of 37 primary melanomas and their adjacent precursor lesions. The histopathological spectrum of these areas included unequivocally benign lesions, intermediate lesions, and intraepidermal or invasive melanomas. RESULTS: Precursor lesions were initiated by mutations of genes that are known to activate the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Unequivocally benign lesions harbored BRAF V600E mutations exclusively, whereas those categorized as intermediate were enriched for NRAS mutations and additional driver mutations. A total of 77% of areas of intermediate lesions and melanomas in situ harbored TERT promoter mutations, a finding that indicates that these mutations are selected at an unexpectedly early stage of the neoplastic progression. Biallelic inactivation of CDKN2A emerged exclusively in invasive melanomas. PTEN and TP53 mutations were found only in advanced primary melanomas. The point-mutation burden increased from benign through intermediate lesions to melanoma, with a strong signature of the effects of ultraviolet radiation detectable at all evolutionary stages. Copy-number alterations became prevalent only in invasive melanomas. Tumor heterogeneity became apparent in the form of genetically distinct subpopulations as melanomas progressed. CONCLUSIONS: Our study defined the succession of genetic alterations during melanoma progression, showing distinct evolutionary trajectories for different melanoma subtypes. It identified an intermediate category of melanocytic neoplasia, characterized by the presence of more than one pathogenic genetic alteration and distinctive histopathological features. Finally, our study implicated ultraviolet radiation as a major factor in both the initiation and progression of melanoma. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1502583

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 1,065

Metadata

Authors
Shain, A. H., Yeh, I., Kovalyshyn, I., Sriharan, A., Talevich, E., Gagnon, A., Dummer, R., North, J., Pincus, L., Ruben, B., Rickaby, W., D’Arrigo, C., Robson, A., & Bastian, B. C.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2015-11-12
Volume
373
Issue
20
Pages
1926-1936
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2220812108
Cited by
1,065
References
4
FWCI
40.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Genetic Evolution of Melanoma from Precursor Lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1502583
The paper
Shain, A. H., Yeh, I., Kovalyshyn, I., Sriharan, A., Talevich, E., Gagnon, A., Dummer, R., North, J., Pincus, L., Ruben, B., Rickaby, W., D’Arrigo, C., Robson, A., & Bastian, B. C. (2015). The Genetic Evolution of Melanoma from Precursor Lesions. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1502583

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.