The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long-Term Results of Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Carotid-Artery Stenosis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: In the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial, we found no significant difference between the stenting group and the endarterectomy group with respect to the primary composite end point of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death during the periprocedural period or any subsequent ipsilateral stroke during 4 years of follow-up. We now extend the results to 10 years. METHODS: Among patients with carotid-artery stenosis who had been randomly assigned to stenting or endarterectomy, we evaluated outcomes every 6 months for up to 10 years at 117 centers. In addition to assessing the primary composite end point, we assessed the primary end point for the long-term extension study, which was ipsilateral stroke after the periprocedural period. RESULTS: Among 2502 patients, there was no significant difference in the rate of the primary composite end point between the stenting group (11.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.1 to 14.8) and the endarterectomy group (9.9%; 95% CI, 7.9 to 12.2) over 10 years of follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.44). With respect to the primary long-term end point, postprocedural ipsilateral stroke over the 10-year follow-up occurred in 6.9% (95% CI, 4.4 to 9.7) of the patients in the stenting group and in 5.6% (95% CI, 3.7 to 7.6) of those in the endarterectomy group; the rates did not differ significantly between the groups (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.52). No significant between-group differences with respect to either end point were detected when symptomatic patients and asymptomatic patients were analyzed separately. CONCLUSIONS: Over 10 years of follow-up, we did not find a significant difference between patients who underwent stenting and those who underwent endarterectomy with respect to the risk of periprocedural stroke, myocardial infarction, or death and subsequent ipsilateral stroke. The rate of postprocedural ipsilateral stroke also did not differ between groups. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and Abbott Vascular Solutions; CREST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00004732.).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Aboyans, V., Ricco, J.-B., Bartelink, M.-L. E. L., Björck, M., Brodmann, M., Cohnert, T., Collet, J.-P., Czerny, M., De Carlo, M., Debus, S., et al. (2018) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx095 · Cited by 3,293
2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases
Mazzolai, L., Teixido-Tura, G., Lanzi, S., Boc, V., Bossone, E., Brodmann, M., Bura-Rivière, A., De Backer, J., Deglise, S., Della Corte, A., et al. (2024) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae179 · Cited by 993
Aboyans, V., Ricco, J.-B., Bartelink, M.-L. E. L., Björck, M., Brodmann, M., Cohnert, T., Collet, J.-P., Czerny, M., De Carlo, M., Debus, S., et al. (2018) · European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.07.018 · Cited by 963
Schermerhorn, M. L., Liang, P., Eldrup-Jorgensen, J., Cronenwett, J. L., Nolan, B. W., Kashyap, V. S., Wang, G. J., Motaganahalli, R. L., & Malas, M. B. (2019) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2019.18441 · Cited by 269
Elevated trimethylamine N -oxide related to ischemic brain lesions after carotid artery stenting
Wu, C., Li, C., Zhao, W., Xie, N., Yan, F., Lian, Y., Zhou, L., Xu, X., Liang, Y., Wang, L., et al. (2018) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000005298 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Brott, T. G., Howard, G., Roubin, G. S., Meschia, J. F., Mackey, A., Brooks, W., Moore, W. S., Hill, M. D., Mantese, V. A., Clark, W. M., Timaran, C. H., Heck, D., Leimgruber, P. P., Sheffet, A. J., Howard, V. J., Chaturvedi, S., Lal, B. K., Voeks, J. H., & Hobson, R. W.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2016-03-17
- Volume
- 374
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1021-1031
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2332609836
- Cited by
- 725
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 79.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Results of Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Carotid-Artery Stenosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1505215
- The paper
- Brott, T. G., Howard, G., Roubin, G. S., Meschia, J. F., Mackey, A., Brooks, W., Moore, W. S., Hill, M. D., Mantese, V. A., Clark, W. M., Timaran, C. H., Heck, D., Leimgruber, P. P., Sheffet, A. J., Howard, V. J., Chaturvedi, S., Lal, B. K., Voeks, J. H., & Hobson, R. W. (2016). Long-Term Results of Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Carotid-Artery Stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1505215
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.