Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 555

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Treatment of Fabry’s Disease with the Pharmacologic Chaperone Migalastat

Open access
Germain, Dominique P., Hughes, Derralynn A., Nicholls, Kathleen, Bichet, Daniel G., Giugliani, Roberto, Wilcox, William R., Feliciani, Claudio, Shankar, Suma P., Ezgu, Fatih, Amartino, Hernan, Bratkovic, Drago, Feldt-Rasmussen, Ulla, Nedd, Khan, Sharaf El Din, Usama, Lourenco, Charles M., Banikazemi, Maryam, Charrow, Joel, Dasouki, Majed, Finegold, David, Giraldo, Pilar, Goker-Alpan, Ozlem, Longo, Nicola, Scott, C. Ronald, Torra, Roser, Tuffaha, Ahmad, Jovanovic, Ana, Waldek, Stephen, Packman, Seymour, Ludington, Elizabeth, Viereck, Christopher, Kirk, John, Yu, Julie, Benjamin, Elfrida R., Johnson, Franklin, Lockhart, David J., Skuban, Nina, Castelli, Jeff, Barth, Jay, Barlow, Carrolee, Schiffmann, Raphael·2016·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fabry's disease, an X-linked disorder of lysosomal α-galactosidase deficiency, leads to substrate accumulation in multiple organs. Migalastat, an oral pharmacologic chaperone, stabilizes specific mutant forms of α-galactosidase, increasing enzyme trafficking to lysosomes. METHODS: The initial assay of mutant α-galactosidase forms that we used to categorize 67 patients with Fabry's disease for randomization to 6 months of double-blind migalastat or placebo (stage 1), followed by open-label migalastat from 6 to 12 months (stage 2) plus an additional year, had certain limitations. Before unblinding, a new, validated assay showed that 50 of the 67 participants had mutant α-galactosidase forms suitable for targeting by migalastat. The primary end point was the percentage of patients who had a response (≥50% reduction in the number of globotriaosylceramide inclusions per kidney interstitial capillary) at 6 months. We assessed safety along with disease substrates and renal, cardiovascular, and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: The primary end-point analysis, involving patients with mutant α-galactosidase forms that were suitable or not suitable for migalastat therapy, did not show a significant treatment effect: 13 of 32 patients (41%) who received migalastat and 9 of 32 patients (28%) who received placebo had a response at 6 months (P=0.30). Among patients with suitable mutant α-galactosidase who received migalastat for up to 24 months, the annualized changes from baseline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and measured GFR were -0.30±0.66 and -1.51±1.33 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) of body-surface area, respectively. The left-ventricular-mass index decreased significantly from baseline (-7.7 g per square meter; 95% confidence interval [CI], -15.4 to -0.01), particularly when left ventricular hypertrophy was present (-18.6 g per square meter; 95% CI, -38.2 to 1.0). The severity of diarrhea, reflux, and indigestion decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Among all randomly assigned patients (with mutant α-galactosidase forms that were suitable or not suitable for migalastat therapy), the percentage of patients who had a response at 6 months did not differ significantly between the migalastat group and the placebo group. (Funded by Amicus Therapeutics; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00925301 [study AT1001-011] and NCT01458119 [study AT1001-041].).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1510198

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Cited by

See all 555

Metadata

Authors
Germain, D. P., Hughes, D. A., Nicholls, K., Bichet, D. G., Giugliani, R., Wilcox, W. R., Feliciani, C., Shankar, S. P., Ezgu, F., Amartino, H., Bratkovic, D., Feldt-Rasmussen, U., Nedd, K., Sharaf El Din, U., Lourenco, C. M., Banikazemi, M., Charrow, J., Dasouki, M., Finegold, D., Giraldo, P., Goker-Alpan, O., Longo, N., Scott, C. R., Torra, R., Tuffaha, A., Jovanovic, A., Waldek, S., Packman, S., Ludington, E., Viereck, C., Kirk, J., Yu, J., Benjamin, E. R., Johnson, F., Lockhart, D. J., Skuban, N., Castelli, J., Barth, J., Barlow, C., & Schiffmann, R.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2016-08-11
Volume
375
Issue
6
Pages
545-555
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2500404244
Cited by
555
References
38
FWCI
34.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of Fabry’s Disease with the Pharmacologic Chaperone Migalastat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1510198
The paper
Germain, D. P., Hughes, D. A., Nicholls, K., Bichet, D. G., Giugliani, R., Wilcox, W. R., Feliciani, C., Shankar, S. P., Ezgu, F., Amartino, H., Bratkovic, D., Feldt-Rasmussen, U., Nedd, K., Sharaf El Din, U., Lourenco, C. M., Banikazemi, M., Charrow, J., Dasouki, M., Finegold, D., . . . Schiffmann, R. (2016). Treatment of Fabry’s Disease with the Pharmacologic Chaperone Migalastat. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1510198

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.