Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 536

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evaluation of Convalescent Plasma for Ebola Virus Disease in Guinea

Open access
van Griensven, Johan, Edwards, Tansy, de Lamballerie, Xavier, Semple, Malcolm G., Gallian, Pierre, Baize, Sylvain, Horby, Peter W., Raoul, Hervé, Magassouba, N’Faly, Antierens, Annick, Lomas, Carolyn, Faye, Ousmane, Sall, Amadou A., Fransen, Katrien, Buyze, Jozefien, Ravinetto, Raffaella, Tiberghien, Pierre, Claeys, Yves, De Crop, Maaike, Lynen, Lutgarde, Bah, Elhadj Ibrahima, Smith, Peter G., Delamou, Alexandre, De Weggheleire, Anja, Haba, Nyankoye·2016·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the wake of the recent outbreak of Ebola virus disease (EVD) in several African countries, the World Health Organization prioritized the evaluation of treatment with convalescent plasma derived from patients who have recovered from the disease. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma for the treatment of EVD in Guinea. METHODS: In this nonrandomized, comparative study, 99 patients of various ages (including pregnant women) with confirmed EVD received two consecutive transfusions of 200 to 250 ml of ABO-compatible convalescent plasma, with each unit of plasma obtained from a separate convalescent donor. The transfusions were initiated on the day of diagnosis or up to 2 days later. The level of neutralizing antibodies against Ebola virus in the plasma was unknown at the time of administration. The control group was 418 patients who had been treated at the same center during the previous 5 months. The primary outcome was the risk of death during the period from 3 to 16 days after diagnosis with adjustments for age and the baseline cycle-threshold value on polymerase-chain-reaction assay; patients who had died before day 3 were excluded. The clinically important difference was defined as an absolute reduction in mortality of 20 percentage points in the convalescent-plasma group as compared with the control group. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients who were treated with plasma were included in the primary analysis. At baseline, the convalescent-plasma group had slightly higher cycle-threshold values and a shorter duration of symptoms than did the control group, along with a higher frequency of eye redness and difficulty in swallowing. From day 3 to day 16 after diagnosis, the risk of death was 31% in the convalescent-plasma group and 38% in the control group (risk difference, -7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -18 to 4). The difference was reduced after adjustment for age and cycle-threshold value (adjusted risk difference, -3 percentage points; 95% CI, -13 to 8). No serious adverse reactions associated with the use of convalescent plasma were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The transfusion of up to 500 ml of convalescent plasma with unknown levels of neutralizing antibodies in 84 patients with confirmed EVD was not associated with a significant improvement in survival. (Funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02342171.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1511812

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 536

Metadata

Authors
van Griensven, J., Edwards, T., de Lamballerie, X., Semple, M. G., Gallian, P., Baize, S., Horby, P. W., Raoul, H., Magassouba, N., Antierens, A., Lomas, C., Faye, O., Sall, A. A., Fransen, K., Buyze, J., Ravinetto, R., Tiberghien, P., Claeys, Y., De Crop, M., Lynen, L., Bah, E. I., Smith, P. G., Delamou, A., De Weggheleire, A., & Haba, N.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2016-01-07
Volume
374
Issue
1
Pages
33-42
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2225294925
Cited by
536
References
0
FWCI
41.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Convalescent Plasma for Ebola Virus Disease in Guinea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1511812
The paper
van Griensven, J., Edwards, T., de Lamballerie, X., Semple, M. G., Gallian, P., Baize, S., Horby, P. W., Raoul, H., Magassouba, N., Antierens, A., Lomas, C., Faye, O., Sall, A. A., Fransen, K., Buyze, J., Ravinetto, R., Tiberghien, P., Claeys, Y., De Crop, M., . . . Haba, N. (2016). Evaluation of Convalescent Plasma for Ebola Virus Disease in Guinea. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1511812

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.