Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 442

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Low-Dose versus Standard-Dose Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Open access
Anderson, Craig S., Robinson, Thompson, Lindley, Richard I., Arima, Hisatomi, Lavados, Pablo M., Lee, Tsong-Hai, Broderick, Joseph P., Chen, Xiaoying, Chen, Guofang, Sharma, Vijay K., Kim, Jong S., Thang, Nguyen H., Cao, Yongjun, Parsons, Mark W., Levi, Christopher, Huang, Yining, Olavarría, Verónica V., Demchuk, Andrew M., Bath, Philip M., Donnan, Geoffrey A., Martins, Sheila, Pontes-Neto, Octavio M., Silva, Federico, Ricci, Stefano, Roffe, Christine, Pandian, Jeyaraj, Billot, Laurent, Woodward, Mark, Li, Qiang, Wang, Xia, Wang, Jiguang, Chalmers, John·2016·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke with a lower-than-standard dose of intravenous alteplase may improve recovery along with a reduced risk of intracerebral hemorrhage. METHODS: Using a 2-by-2 quasi-factorial open-label design, we randomly assigned 3310 patients who were eligible for thrombolytic therapy (median age, 67 years; 63% Asian) to low-dose intravenous alteplase (0.6 mg per kilogram of body weight) or the standard dose (0.9 mg per kilogram); patients underwent randomization within 4.5 hours after the onset of stroke. The primary objective was to determine whether the low dose would be noninferior to the standard dose with respect to the primary outcome of death or disability at 90 days, which was defined by scores of 2 to 6 on the modified Rankin scale (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]). Secondary objectives were to determine whether the low dose would be superior to the standard dose with respect to centrally adjudicated symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and whether the low dose would be noninferior in an ordinal analysis of modified Rankin scale scores (testing for an improvement in the distribution of scores). The trial included 935 patients who were also randomly assigned to intensive or guideline-recommended blood-pressure control. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in 855 of 1607 participants (53.2%) in the low-dose group and in 817 of 1599 participants (51.1%) in the standard-dose group (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95 to 1.25; the upper boundary exceeded the noninferiority margin of 1.14; P=0.51 for noninferiority). Low-dose alteplase was noninferior in the ordinal analysis of modified Rankin scale scores (unadjusted common odds ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.13; P=0.04 for noninferiority). Major symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 1.0% of the participants in the low-dose group and in 2.1% of the participants in the standard-dose group (P=0.01); fatal events occurred within 7 days in 0.5% and 1.5%, respectively (P=0.01). Mortality at 90 days did not differ significantly between the two groups (8.5% and 10.3%, respectively; P=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: This trial involving predominantly Asian patients with acute ischemic stroke did not show the noninferiority of low-dose alteplase to standard-dose alteplase with respect to death and disability at 90 days. There were significantly fewer symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages with low-dose alteplase. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and others; ENCHANTED ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01422616.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1515510

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 442

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, C. S., Robinson, T., Lindley, R. I., Arima, H., Lavados, P. M., Lee, T.-H., Broderick, J. P., Chen, X., Chen, G., Sharma, V. K., Kim, J. S., Thang, N. H., Cao, Y., Parsons, M. W., Levi, C., Huang, Y., Olavarría, V. V., Demchuk, A. M., Bath, P. M., Donnan, G. A., Martins, S., Pontes-Neto, O. M., Silva, F., Ricci, S., Roffe, C., Pandian, J., Billot, L., Woodward, M., Li, Q., Wang, X., Wang, J., & Chalmers, J.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2016-06-16
Volume
374
Issue
24
Pages
2313-2323
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2350862887
Cited by
442
References
5
FWCI
49.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low-Dose versus Standard-Dose Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1515510
The paper
Anderson, C. S., Robinson, T., Lindley, R. I., Arima, H., Lavados, P. M., Lee, T.-H., Broderick, J. P., Chen, X., Chen, G., Sharma, V. K., Kim, J. S., Thang, N. H., Cao, Y., Parsons, M. W., Levi, C., Huang, Y., Olavarría, V. V., Demchuk, A. M., Bath, P. M., . . . Chalmers, J. (2016). Low-Dose versus Standard-Dose Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1515510

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.