The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Indacaterol–Glycopyrronium versus Salmeterol–Fluticasone for COPD
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Most guidelines recommend either a long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) plus an inhaled glucocorticoid or a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) as the first-choice treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who have a high risk of exacerbations. The role of treatment with a LABA-LAMA regimen in these patients is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a 52-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, noninferiority trial. Patients who had COPD with a history of at least one exacerbation during the previous year were randomly assigned to receive, by inhalation, either the LABA indacaterol (110 μg) plus the LAMA glycopyrronium (50 μg) once daily or the LABA salmeterol (50 μg) plus the inhaled glucocorticoid fluticasone (500 μg) twice daily. The primary outcome was the annual rate of all COPD exacerbations. RESULTS: A total of 1680 patients were assigned to the indacaterol-glycopyrronium group, and 1682 to the salmeterol-fluticasone group. Indacaterol-glycopyrronium showed not only noninferiority but also superiority to salmeterol-fluticasone in reducing the annual rate of all COPD exacerbations; the rate was 11% lower in the indacaterol-glycopyrronium group than in the salmeterol-fluticasone group (3.59 vs. 4.03; rate ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 0.96; P=0.003). The indacaterol-glycopyrronium group had a longer time to the first exacerbation than did the salmeterol-fluticasone group (71 days [95% CI, 60 to 82] vs. 51 days [95% CI, 46 to 57]; hazard ratio, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.91], representing a 16% lower risk; P<0.001). The annual rate of moderate or severe exacerbations was lower in the indacaterol-glycopyrronium group than in the salmeterol-fluticasone group (0.98 vs. 1.19; rate ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.91; P<0.001), and the time to the first moderate or severe exacerbation was longer in the indacaterol-glycopyrronium group than in the salmeterol-fluticasone group (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.86; P<0.001), as was the time to the first severe exacerbation (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.00; P=0.046). The effect of indacaterol-glycopyrronium versus salmeterol-fluticasone on the rate of COPD exacerbations was independent of the baseline blood eosinophil count. The incidence of adverse events and deaths was similar in the two groups. The incidence of pneumonia was 3.2% in the indacaterol-glycopyrronium group and 4.8% in the salmeterol-fluticasone group (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Indacaterol-glycopyrronium was more effective than salmeterol-fluticasone in preventing COPD exacerbations in patients with a history of exacerbation during the previous year. (Funded by Novartis; FLAME ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01782326.).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vogelmeier, C. F., Criner, G. J., Martinez, F. J., Anzueto, A., Barnes, P. J., Bourbeau, J., Celli, B. R., Chen, R., Decramer, M., Fabbri, L. M., et al. (2017) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201701-0218pp · Cited by 3,187
Self-citationOnce-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple versus Dual Therapy in Patients with COPD
Lipson, D. A., Barnhart, F., Brealey, N., Brooks, J., Criner, G. J., Day, N. C., Dransfield, M. T., Halpin, D. M. G., Han, M. K., Jones, C. E., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1713901 · Cited by 1,253
MacLeod, M., Papi, A., Contoli, M., Beghé, B., Celli, B. R., Wedzicha, J. A., & Fabbri, L. M. (2021) · Respirology · doi:10.1111/resp.14041 · Cited by 359
Self-citationChemokines in COPD: From Implication to Therapeutic Use
Henrot, P., Prevel, R., Berger, P., & Dupin, I. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20112785 · Cited by 131
The impact of integrated disease management in high-risk COPD patients in primary care
Ferrone, M., Masciantonio, M. G., Malus, N., Stitt, L., O’Callahan, T., Roberts, Z., Johnson, L., Samson, J., Durocher, L., Ferrari, M., et al. (2019) · npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41533-019-0119-9 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Wedzicha, J. A., Banerji, D., Chapman, K. R., Vestbo, J., Roche, N., Ayers, R. T., Thach, C., Fogel, R., Patalano, F., & Vogelmeier, C. F.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2016-06-09
- Volume
- 374
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 2222-2234
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2365138737
- Cited by
- 844
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 125.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Indacaterol–Glycopyrronium versus Salmeterol–Fluticasone for COPD. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1516385
- The paper
- Wedzicha, J. A., Banerji, D., Chapman, K. R., Vestbo, J., Roche, N., Ayers, R. T., Thach, C., Fogel, R., Patalano, F., & Vogelmeier, C. F. (2016). Indacaterol–Glycopyrronium versus Salmeterol–Fluticasone for COPD. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1516385
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.