The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cardiovascular Safety of Celecoxib, Naproxen, or Ibuprofen for Arthritis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular safety of celecoxib, as compared with nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), remains uncertain. METHODS: Patients who required NSAIDs for osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis and were at increased cardiovascular risk were randomly assigned to receive celecoxib, ibuprofen, or naproxen. The goal of the trial was to assess the noninferiority of celecoxib with regard to the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death (including hemorrhagic death), nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Noninferiority required a hazard ratio of 1.12 or lower, as well as an upper 97.5% confidence limit of 1.33 or lower in the intention-to-treat population and of 1.40 or lower in the on-treatment population. Gastrointestinal and renal outcomes were also adjudicated. RESULTS: A total of 24,081 patients were randomly assigned to the celecoxib group (mean [±SD] daily dose, 209±37 mg), the naproxen group (852±103 mg), or the ibuprofen group (2045±246 mg) for a mean treatment duration of 20.3±16.0 months and a mean follow-up period of 34.1±13.4 months. During the trial, 68.8% of the patients stopped taking the study drug, and 27.4% of the patients discontinued follow-up. In the intention-to-treat analyses, a primary outcome event occurred in 188 patients in the celecoxib group (2.3%), 201 patients in the naproxen group (2.5%), and 218 patients in the ibuprofen group (2.7%) (hazard ratio for celecoxib vs. naproxen, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 1.13; hazard ratio for celecoxib vs. ibuprofen, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.04; P<0.001 for noninferiority in both comparisons). In the on-treatment analysis, a primary outcome event occurred in 134 patients in the celecoxib group (1.7%), 144 patients in the naproxen group (1.8%), and 155 patients in the ibuprofen group (1.9%) (hazard ratio for celecoxib vs. naproxen, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.15; hazard ratio for celecoxib vs. ibuprofen, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.02; P<0.001 for noninferiority in both comparisons). The risk of gastrointestinal events was significantly lower with celecoxib than with naproxen (P=0.01) or ibuprofen (P=0.002); the risk of renal events was significantly lower with celecoxib than with ibuprofen (P=0.004) but was not significantly lower with celecoxib than with naproxen (P=0.19). CONCLUSIONS: At moderate doses, celecoxib was found to be noninferior to ibuprofen or naproxen with regard to cardiovascular safety. (Funded by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00346216 .).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hawker, G. A., Mian, S., Kendzerska, T., & French, M. (2011) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.20543 · Cited by 4,924
Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors and the Antiplatelet Effects of Aspirin
Catella-Lawson, F., Reilly, M. P., Kapoor, S. C., Cucchiara, A. J., DeMarco, S., Tournier, B., Vyas, S. N., & FitzGerald, G. A. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa003199 · Cited by 1,394
Machado, G. C., Maher, C. G., Ferreira, P. H., Pinheiro, M. B., Lin, C.-W. C., Day, R. O., McLachlan, A. J., & Ferreira, M. L. (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.h1225 · Cited by 580
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 10.1136/gut.47.3.320 · doi:10.1136/gut.47.3.320
- 10.1056/NEJMoa050405 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.12.014 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.308.6921.81 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004480 · DOI
- 10.1186/ar2422 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.284.10.1247 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJMoa061652 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Libby, P., Buring, J. E., Badimon, L., Hansson, G. K., Deanfield, J., Bittencourt, M. S., Tokgözoğlu, L., & Lewis, E. F. (2019) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-019-0106-z · Cited by 3,211
Self-citationKolasinski, S. L., Neogi, T., Hochberg, M. C., Oatis, C., Guyatt, G., Block, J., Callahan, L., Copenhaver, C., Dodge, C., Felson, D., et al. (2020) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.24131 · Cited by 2,516
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and organ damage: A current perspective
Bindu, S., Mazumder, S., & Bandyopadhyay, U. (2020) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114147 · Cited by 1,920
Subchondral bone microenvironment in osteoarthritis and pain
Hu, Y., Chen, X., Wang, S., Jing, Y., & Su, J. (2021) · Bone Research · doi:10.1038/s41413-021-00147-z · Cited by 577
Bally, M., Dendukuri, N., Rich, B., Nadeau, L., Helin-Salmivaara, A., Garbe, E., & Brophy, J. M. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j1909 · Cited by 528
Metadata
- Authors
- Nissen, S. E., Yeomans, N. D., Solomon, D. H., Lüscher, T. F., Libby, P., Husni, M. E., Graham, D. Y., Borer, J. S., Wisniewski, L. M., Wolski, K. E., Wang, Q., Menon, V., Ruschitzka, F., Gaffney, M., Beckerman, B., Berger, M. F., Bao, W., & Lincoff, A. M.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2016-12-29
- Volume
- 375
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 2519-2529
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2556825373
- Cited by
- 856
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 71.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cardiovascular Safety of Celecoxib, Naproxen, or Ibuprofen for Arthritis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1611593
- The paper
- Nissen, S. E., Yeomans, N. D., Solomon, D. H., Lüscher, T. F., Libby, P., Husni, M. E., Graham, D. Y., Borer, J. S., Wisniewski, L. M., Wolski, K. E., Wang, Q., Menon, V., Ruschitzka, F., Gaffney, M., Beckerman, B., Berger, M. F., Bao, W., & Lincoff, A. M. (2016). Cardiovascular Safety of Celecoxib, Naproxen, or Ibuprofen for Arthritis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1611593
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.