Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 856

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cardiovascular Safety of Celecoxib, Naproxen, or Ibuprofen for Arthritis

Open access
Nissen, Steven E., Yeomans, Neville D., Solomon, Daniel H., Lüscher, Thomas F., Libby, Peter, Husni, M. Elaine, Graham, David Y., Borer, Jeffrey S., Wisniewski, Lisa M., Wolski, Katherine E., Wang, Qiuqing, Menon, Venu, Ruschitzka, Frank, Gaffney, Michael, Beckerman, Bruce, Berger, Manuela F., Bao, Weihang, Lincoff, A. Michael·2016·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular safety of celecoxib, as compared with nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), remains uncertain. METHODS: Patients who required NSAIDs for osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis and were at increased cardiovascular risk were randomly assigned to receive celecoxib, ibuprofen, or naproxen. The goal of the trial was to assess the noninferiority of celecoxib with regard to the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death (including hemorrhagic death), nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Noninferiority required a hazard ratio of 1.12 or lower, as well as an upper 97.5% confidence limit of 1.33 or lower in the intention-to-treat population and of 1.40 or lower in the on-treatment population. Gastrointestinal and renal outcomes were also adjudicated. RESULTS: A total of 24,081 patients were randomly assigned to the celecoxib group (mean [±SD] daily dose, 209±37 mg), the naproxen group (852±103 mg), or the ibuprofen group (2045±246 mg) for a mean treatment duration of 20.3±16.0 months and a mean follow-up period of 34.1±13.4 months. During the trial, 68.8% of the patients stopped taking the study drug, and 27.4% of the patients discontinued follow-up. In the intention-to-treat analyses, a primary outcome event occurred in 188 patients in the celecoxib group (2.3%), 201 patients in the naproxen group (2.5%), and 218 patients in the ibuprofen group (2.7%) (hazard ratio for celecoxib vs. naproxen, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 1.13; hazard ratio for celecoxib vs. ibuprofen, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.04; P<0.001 for noninferiority in both comparisons). In the on-treatment analysis, a primary outcome event occurred in 134 patients in the celecoxib group (1.7%), 144 patients in the naproxen group (1.8%), and 155 patients in the ibuprofen group (1.9%) (hazard ratio for celecoxib vs. naproxen, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.15; hazard ratio for celecoxib vs. ibuprofen, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.02; P<0.001 for noninferiority in both comparisons). The risk of gastrointestinal events was significantly lower with celecoxib than with naproxen (P=0.01) or ibuprofen (P=0.002); the risk of renal events was significantly lower with celecoxib than with ibuprofen (P=0.004) but was not significantly lower with celecoxib than with naproxen (P=0.19). CONCLUSIONS: At moderate doses, celecoxib was found to be noninferior to ibuprofen or naproxen with regard to cardiovascular safety. (Funded by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00346216 .).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1611593

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 10.1136/gut.47.3.320 · doi:10.1136/gut.47.3.320
  2. 10.1056/NEJMoa050405 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.12.014 · DOI
  4. 10.1136/bmj.308.6921.81 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004480 · DOI
  6. 10.1186/ar2422 · DOI
  7. 10.1001/jama.284.10.1247 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1056/NEJMoa061652 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 856

Metadata

Authors
Nissen, S. E., Yeomans, N. D., Solomon, D. H., Lüscher, T. F., Libby, P., Husni, M. E., Graham, D. Y., Borer, J. S., Wisniewski, L. M., Wolski, K. E., Wang, Q., Menon, V., Ruschitzka, F., Gaffney, M., Beckerman, B., Berger, M. F., Bao, W., & Lincoff, A. M.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2016-12-29
Volume
375
Issue
26
Pages
2519-2529
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2556825373
Cited by
856
References
3
FWCI
71.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cardiovascular Safety of Celecoxib, Naproxen, or Ibuprofen for Arthritis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1611593
The paper
Nissen, S. E., Yeomans, N. D., Solomon, D. H., Lüscher, T. F., Libby, P., Husni, M. E., Graham, D. Y., Borer, J. S., Wisniewski, L. M., Wolski, K. E., Wang, Q., Menon, V., Ruschitzka, F., Gaffney, M., Beckerman, B., Berger, M. F., Bao, W., & Lincoff, A. M. (2016). Cardiovascular Safety of Celecoxib, Naproxen, or Ibuprofen for Arthritis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1611593

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.