The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Completion Dissection or Observation for Sentinel-Node Metastasis in Melanoma
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy is associated with increased melanoma-specific survival (i.e., survival until death from melanoma) among patients with node-positive intermediate-thickness melanomas (1.2 to 3.5 mm). The value of completion lymph-node dissection for patients with sentinel-node metastases is not clear. METHODS: In an international trial, we randomly assigned patients with sentinel-node metastases detected by means of standard pathological assessment or a multimarker molecular assay to immediate completion lymph-node dissection (dissection group) or nodal observation with ultrasonography (observation group). The primary end point was melanoma-specific survival. Secondary end points included disease-free survival and the cumulative rate of nonsentinel-node metastasis. RESULTS: Immediate completion lymph-node dissection was not associated with increased melanoma-specific survival among 1934 patients with data that could be evaluated in an intention-to-treat analysis or among 1755 patients in the per-protocol analysis. In the per-protocol analysis, the mean (±SE) 3-year rate of melanoma-specific survival was similar in the dissection group and the observation group (86±1.3% and 86±1.2%, respectively; P=0.42 by the log-rank test) at a median follow-up of 43 months. The rate of disease-free survival was slightly higher in the dissection group than in the observation group (68±1.7% and 63±1.7%, respectively; P=0.05 by the log-rank test) at 3 years, based on an increased rate of disease control in the regional nodes at 3 years (92±1.0% vs. 77±1.5%; P<0.001 by the log-rank test); these results must be interpreted with caution. Nonsentinel-node metastases, identified in 11.5% of the patients in the dissection group, were a strong, independent prognostic factor for recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.78; P=0.005). Lymphedema was observed in 24.1% of the patients in the dissection group and in 6.3% of those in the observation group. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate completion lymph-node dissection increased the rate of regional disease control and provided prognostic information but did not increase melanoma-specific survival among patients with melanoma and sentinel-node metastases. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; MSLT-II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00297895 .).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage III or IV melanoma
Weber, J., Mandala, M., Del Vecchio, M., Gogas, H. J., Arance, A. M., Cowey, C. L., Dalle, S., Schenker, M., Chiarion-Sileni, V., Marquez-Rodas, I., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1709030 · Cited by 2,246
Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma
Eggermont, A. M. M., Blank, C. U., Mandala, M., Long, G. V., Atkinson, V., Dalle, S., Haydon, A., Lichinitser, M., Khattak, A., Carlino, M. S., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1802357 · Cited by 1,906
Long, G. V., Swetter, S. M., Menzies, A. M., Gershenwald, J. E., & Scolyer, R. A. (2023) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00821-8 · Cited by 746
Self-citationMelanoma Staging: American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition and Beyond
Gershenwald, J. E., & Scolyer, R. A. (2018) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-018-6513-7 · Cited by 452
Self-citationMetastasis-Initiating Cells and Ecosystems
Massagué, J., & Ganesh, K. (2021) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-0010 · Cited by 372
Metadata
- Authors
- Faries, M. B., Thompson, J. F., Cochran, A. J., Andtbacka, R. H., Mozzillo, N., Zager, J. S., Jahkola, T., Bowles, T. L., Testori, A., Beitsch, P. D., Hoekstra, H. J., Moncrieff, M., Ingvar, C., Wouters, M. W. J. M., Sabel, M. S., Levine, E. A., Agnese, D., Henderson, M., Dummer, R., Rossi, C. R., Neves, R. I., Trocha, S. D., Wright, F., Byrd, D. R., Matter, M., Hsueh, E., MacKenzie-Ross, A., Johnson, D. B., Terheyden, P., Berger, A. C., Huston, T. L., Wayne, J. D., Smithers, B. M., Neuman, H. B., Schneebaum, S., Gershenwald, J. E., Ariyan, C. E., Desai, D. C., Jacobs, L., McMasters, K. M., Gesierich, A., Hersey, P., Bines, S. D., Kane, J. M., Barth, R. J., McKinnon, G., Farma, J. M., Schultz, E., Vidal-Sicart, S., Hoefer, R. A., Lewis, J. M., Scheri, R., Kelley, M. C., Nieweg, O. E., Noyes, R. D., Hoon, D. S. B., Wang, H.-J., Elashoff, D. A., & Elashoff, R. M.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2017-06-08
- Volume
- 376
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 2211-2222
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2624147378
- Cited by
- 1,414
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 65.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Completion Dissection or Observation for Sentinel-Node Metastasis in Melanoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1613210
- The paper
- Faries, M. B., Thompson, J. F., Cochran, A. J., Andtbacka, R. H., Mozzillo, N., Zager, J. S., Jahkola, T., Bowles, T. L., Testori, A., Beitsch, P. D., Hoekstra, H. J., Moncrieff, M., Ingvar, C., Wouters, M. W. J. M., Sabel, M. S., Levine, E. A., Agnese, D., Henderson, M., Dummer, R., . . . Elashoff, R. M. (2017). Completion Dissection or Observation for Sentinel-Node Metastasis in Melanoma. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1613210
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.