The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tofacitinib or Adalimumab versus Placebo for Psoriatic Arthritis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor that is under investigation for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. We evaluated tofacitinib in patients with active psoriatic arthritis who previously had an inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). METHODS: In this 12-month, double-blind, active-controlled and placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients in a 2:2:2:1:1 ratio to receive one of the following regimens: tofacitinib at a 5-mg dose taken orally twice daily (107 patients), tofacitinib at a 10-mg dose taken orally twice daily (104), adalimumab at a 40-mg dose administered subcutaneously once every 2 weeks (106), placebo with a blinded switch to the 5-mg tofacitinib dose at 3 months (52), or placebo with a blinded switch to the 10-mg tofacitinib dose at 3 months (53). Placebo groups were pooled for analyses up to month 3. Primary end points were the proportion of patients who had an American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) response (≥20% improvement from baseline in the number of tender and swollen joints and at least three of five other important domains) at month 3 and the change from baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score (scores range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater disability) at month 3. RESULTS: ACR20 response rates at month 3 were 50% in the 5-mg tofacitinib group and 61% in the 10-mg tofacitinib group, as compared with 33% in the placebo group (P=0.01 for the comparison of the 5-mg dose with placebo; P<0.001 for the comparison of the 10-mg dose with placebo); the rate was 52% in the adalimumab group. The mean change in the HAQ-DI score was -0.35 in the 5-mg tofacitinib group and -0.40 in the 10-mg tofacitinib group, as compared with -0.18 in the placebo group (P=0.006 for the comparison of the 5-mg dose with placebo; P<0.001 for the comparison of the 10-mg dose with placebo); the score change was -0.38 in the adalimumab group. The rate of adverse events through month 12 was 66% in the 5-mg tofacitinib group, 71% in the 10-mg tofacitinib group, 72% in the adalimumab group, 69% in the placebo group that switched to the 5-mg tofacitinib dose, and 64% in the placebo group that switched to the 10-mg tofacitinib dose. There were four cases of cancer, three serious infections, and four cases of herpes zoster in patients who received tofacitinib during the trial. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of tofacitinib was superior to that of placebo at month 3 in patients with psoriatic arthritis who had previously had an inadequate response to conventional synthetic DMARDs. Adverse events were more frequent with tofacitinib than with placebo. (Funded by Pfizer; OPAL Broaden ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01877668 .).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life
(1990) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 · Cited by 15,736
Ware, J. E. (2000) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00008 · Cited by 4,455
Janus kinases in immune cell signaling
Ghoreschi, K., Laurence, A., & O’Shea, J. J. (2009) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1600-065x.2008.00754.x · Cited by 1,149
Cited by
The JAK/STAT signaling pathway: from bench to clinic
Hu, X., li, J., Fu, M., Zhao, X., & Wang, W. (2021) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-021-00791-1 · Cited by 2,633
Janus kinase-targeting therapies in rheumatology: A mechanisms-based approach
Tanaka, Y., Luo, Y., O’Shea, J. J., & Nakayamada, S. (2022) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/s41584-021-00726-8 · Cited by 501
JAK inhibitors for the treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases
Jamilloux, Y., El Jammal, T., Vuitton, L., Gerfaud-Valentin, M., Kerever, S., & Sève, P. (2019) · Autoimmunity Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2019.102390 · Cited by 264
Janus Kinase Inhibitors in the Treatment of Vitiligo: A Review
Qi, F., Liu, F., & Gao, L. (2021) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.790125 · Cited by 203
Mease, P., Coates, L. C., Helliwell, P. S., Stanislavchuk, M., Rychlewska-Hanczewska, A., Dudek, A., Abi-Saab, W., Tasset, C., Meuleners, L., Harrison, P., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32483-8 · Cited by 196
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mease, P., Hall, S., FitzGerald, O., van der Heijde, D., Merola, J. F., Avila-Zapata, F., Cieślak, D., Graham, D., Wang, C., Menon, S., Hendrikx, T., & Kanik, K. S.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2017-10-19
- Volume
- 377
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1537-1550
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2766846920
- Cited by
- 571
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 43.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tofacitinib or Adalimumab versus Placebo for Psoriatic Arthritis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1615975
- The paper
- Mease, P., Hall, S., FitzGerald, O., van der Heijde, D., Merola, J. F., Avila-Zapata, F., Cieślak, D., Graham, D., Wang, C., Menon, S., Hendrikx, T., & Kanik, K. S. (2017). Tofacitinib or Adalimumab versus Placebo for Psoriatic Arthritis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1615975
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.