The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mepolizumab or Placebo for Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis is an eosinophilic vasculitis. Mepolizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, reduces blood eosinophil counts and may have value in the treatment of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned participants with relapsing or refractory eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis who had received treatment for at least 4 weeks and were taking a stable prednisolone or prednisone dose to receive 300 mg of mepolizumab or placebo, administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks, plus standard care, for 52 weeks. The two primary end points were the accrued weeks of remission over a 52-week period, according to categorical quantification, and the proportion of participants in remission at both week 36 and week 48. Secondary end points included the time to first relapse and the average daily glucocorticoid dose (during weeks 48 through 52). The annualized relapse rate and safety were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 136 participants underwent randomization, with 68 participants assigned to receive mepolizumab and 68 to receive placebo. Mepolizumab treatment led to significantly more accrued weeks of remission than placebo (28% vs. 3% of the participants had ≥24 weeks of accrued remission; odds ratio, 5.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.68 to 13.03; P<0.001) and a higher percentage of participants in remission at both week 36 and week 48 (32% vs. 3%; odds ratio, 16.74; 95% CI, 3.61 to 77.56; P<0.001). Remission did not occur in 47% of the participants in the mepolizumab group versus 81% of those in the placebo group. The annualized relapse rate was 1.14 in the mepolizumab group, as compared with 2.27 in the placebo group (rate ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.70; P<0.001). A total of 44% of the participants in the mepolizumab group, as compared with 7% of those in the placebo group, had an average daily dose of prednisolone or prednisone of 4.0 mg or less per day during weeks 48 through 52 (odds ratio, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.41; P<0.001). The safety profile of mepolizumab was similar to that observed in previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: In participants with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, mepolizumab resulted in significantly more weeks in remission and a higher proportion of participants in remission than did placebo, thus allowing for reduced glucocorticoid use. Even so, only approximately half the participants treated with mepolizumab had protocol-defined remission. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02020889 .).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Groh, M., Pagnoux, C., Baldini, C., Bel, E., Bottero, P., Cottin, V., Dalhoff, K., Dunogué, B., Gross, W., Holle, J., et al. (2015) · European Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2015.04.022 · Cited by 476
Self-citationMepolizumab as a steroid-sparing treatment option in patients with Churg-Strauss syndrome
Kim, S., Marigowda, G., Oren, E., Israel, E., & Wechsler, M. E. (2010) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2010.03.028 · Cited by 280
Self-citation
Cited by
International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: rhinosinusitis 2021
Orlandi, R. R., Kingdom, T. T., Smith, T. L., Bleier, B., DeConde, A., Luong, A. U., Poetker, D. M., Soler, Z., Welch, K. C., Wise, S. K., et al. (2021) · International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology · doi:10.1002/alr.22741 · Cited by 959
Kitching, A. R., Anders, H.-J., Basu, N., Brouwer, E., Gordon, J., Jayne, D. R., Kullman, J., Lyons, P. A., Merkel, P. A., Savage, C. O. S., et al. (2020) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-020-0204-y · Cited by 928
Self-citationEULAR recommendations for the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis: 2022 update
Hellmich, B., Sanchez-Alamo, B., Schirmer, J. H., Berti, A., Blockmans, D., Cid, M. C., Holle, J. U., Hollinger, N., Karadag, O., Kronbichler, A., et al. (2024) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard-2022-223764 · Cited by 768
Self-citationInternational consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Allergic rhinitis – 2023
Wise, S. K., Damask, C., Roland, L. T., Ebert, C., Levy, J. M., Lin, S., Luong, A., Rodriguez, K., Sedaghat, A. R., Toskala, E., et al. (2023) · International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology · doi:10.1002/alr.23090 · Cited by 507
Pathogenesis and therapeutic interventions for ANCA-associated vasculitis
Nakazawa, D., Masuda, S., Tomaru, U., & Ishizu, A. (2019) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/s41584-018-0145-y · Cited by 477
Metadata
- Authors
- Wechsler, M. E., Akuthota, P., Jayne, D., Khoury, P., Klion, A., Langford, C. A., Merkel, P. A., Moosig, F., Specks, U., Cid, M. C., Luqmani, R., Brown, J., Mallett, S., Philipson, R., Yancey, S. W., Steinfeld, J., Weller, P. F., & Gleich, G. J.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2017-05-18
- Volume
- 376
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 1921-1932
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2615817830
- Cited by
- 1,094
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 63.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mepolizumab or Placebo for Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1702079
- The paper
- Wechsler, M. E., Akuthota, P., Jayne, D., Khoury, P., Klion, A., Langford, C. A., Merkel, P. A., Moosig, F., Specks, U., Cid, M. C., Luqmani, R., Brown, J., Mallett, S., Philipson, R., Yancey, S. W., Steinfeld, J., Weller, P. F., & Gleich, G. J. (2017). Mepolizumab or Placebo for Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1702079
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.