Cited by 1,801Prostate Cancer Treatment and ResearchProstate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentBone health and treatments

Abiraterone for prostate cancer not previously treated with hormone therapy

Open access
James, Nicholas D., de Bono, Johann S., Spears, Melissa R., Clarke, Noel W., Mason, Malcolm D., Dearnaley, David P., Ritchie, Alastair W.S., Amos, Claire L. +39 more·2017·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone improves survival in men with relapsed prostate cancer. We assessed the effect of this combination in men starting long-term androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), using a multigroup, multistage trial design. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive ADT alone or ADT plus abiraterone acetate (1000 mg daily) and prednisolone (5 mg daily) (combination therapy). Local radiotherapy was mandated for patients with node-negative, nonmetastatic disease and encouraged for those with positive nodes. For patients with nonmetastatic disease with no radiotherapy planned and for patients with metastatic disease, treatment continued until radiologic, clinical, or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression; otherwise, treatment was to continue for 2 years or until any type of progression, whichever came first. The primary outcome measure was overall survival. The intermediate primary outcome was failure-free survival (treatment failure was defined as radiologic, clinical, or PSA progression or death from prostate cancer). RESULTS: A total of 1917 patients underwent randomization from November 2011 through January 2014. The median age was 67 years, and the median PSA level was 53 ng per milliliter. A total of 52% of the patients had metastatic disease, 20% had node-positive or node-indeterminate nonmetastatic disease, and 28% had node-negative, nonmetastatic disease; 95% had newly diagnosed disease. The median follow-up was 40 months. There were 184 deaths in the combination group as compared with 262 in the ADT-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52 to 0.76; P<0.001); the hazard ratio was 0.75 in patients with nonmetastatic disease and 0.61 in those with metastatic disease. There were 248 treatment-failure events in the combination group as compared with 535 in the ADT-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.34; P<0.001); the hazard ratio was 0.21 in patients with nonmetastatic disease and 0.31 in those with metastatic disease. Grade 3 to 5 adverse events occurred in 47% of the patients in the combination group (with nine grade 5 events) and in 33% of the patients in the ADT-alone group (with three grade 5 events). CONCLUSIONS: Among men with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer, ADT plus abiraterone and prednisolone was associated with significantly higher rates of overall and failure-free survival than ADT alone. (Funded by Cancer Research U.K. and others; STAMPEDE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00268476 , and Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN78818544 .).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1702900

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 1,801

Authors
James, N. D., de Bono, J. S., Spears, M. R., Clarke, N. W., Mason, M. D., Dearnaley, D. P., Ritchie, A. W. S., Amos, C. L., Gilson, C., Jones, R. J., Matheson, D., Millman, R., Attard, G., Chowdhury, S., Cross, W. R., Gillessen, S., Parker, C. C., Russell, J. M., Berthold, D. R., Brawley, C., Adab, F., Aung, S., Birtle, A. J., Bowen, J., Brock, S., Chakraborti, P., Ferguson, C., Gale, J., Gray, E., Hingorani, M., Hoskin, P. J., Lester, J. F., Malik, Z. I., McKinna, F., McPhail, N., Money-Kyrle, J., O’Sullivan, J., Parikh, O., Protheroe, A., Robinson, A., Srihari, N. N., Thomas, C., Wagstaff, J., Wylie, J., Zarkar, A., Parmar, M. K. B., & Sydes, M. R.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Institute of Cancer Research (GB)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2017-07-27
Volume
377
Issue
4
Pages
338-351
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2620746860
Cited by
1,801
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 110 · 2025: 162 · 2024: 159 · 2023: 174 · 2022: 190 · 2021: 217 · 2020: 218 · 2019: 232 · 2018: 240 · 2017: 95 · 2016: 1
FWCI
178.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Leeds Beckett Repository (Leeds Beckett University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • Royal Devon and Exeter Research Repository (Royal Devon and Exeter) (submittedVersion)
  • Wolverhampton Intellectual Repository and E-Theses (University of Wolverhampton) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
  • Cancer Research UK (12518, 22744)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0611-10106)
  • King's College London
  • University College London
  • University of Sussex
  • University of Glasgow
  • Cardiff University
  • Swansea University
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
Keywords
abiraterone, prednisolone, prostate cancer, androgen deprivation therapy, metastatic prostate cancer, non-metastatic prostate cancer, overall survival, failure-free survival, local radiotherapy, prostate-specific antigen progression, adverse events, newly diagnosed prostate cancer, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
MeSH terms
Abiraterone Acetate, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Androgen Antagonists, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Prednisolone, Prostatic Neoplasms, Steroid 17-alpha-Hydroxylase, Survival Analysis, Prostate-Specific Antigen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review