Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,633

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Edoxaban for the Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism

Open access
Raskob, Gary E., van Es, Nick, Verhamme, Peter, Carrier, Marc, Di Nisio, Marcello, Garcia, David, Grosso, Michael A., Kakkar, Ajay K., Kovacs, Michael J., Mercuri, Michele F., Meyer, Guy, Segers, Annelise, Shi, Minggao, Wang, Tzu-Fei, Yeo, Erik, Zhang, George, Zwicker, Jeffrey I., Weitz, Jeffrey I., Büller, Harry R.·2018·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparin is the standard treatment for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. The role of treatment with direct oral anticoagulant agents is unclear. METHODS: In this open-label, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned patients with cancer who had acute symptomatic or incidental venous thromboembolism to receive either low-molecular-weight heparin for at least 5 days followed by oral edoxaban at a dose of 60 mg once daily (edoxaban group) or subcutaneous dalteparin at a dose of 200 IU per kilogram of body weight once daily for 1 month followed by dalteparin at a dose of 150 IU per kilogram once daily (dalteparin group). Treatment was given for at least 6 months and up to 12 months. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent venous thromboembolism or major bleeding during the 12 months after randomization, regardless of treatment duration. RESULTS: Of the 1050 patients who underwent randomization, 1046 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. A primary-outcome event occurred in 67 of the 522 patients (12.8%) in the edoxaban group as compared with 71 of the 524 patients (13.5%) in the dalteparin group (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 1.36; P=0.006 for noninferiority; P=0.87 for superiority). Recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 41 patients (7.9%) in the edoxaban group and in 59 patients (11.3%) in the dalteparin group (difference in risk, -3.4 percentage points; 95% CI, -7.0 to 0.2). Major bleeding occurred in 36 patients (6.9%) in the edoxaban group and in 21 patients (4.0%) in the dalteparin group (difference in risk, 2.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.1 to 5.6). CONCLUSIONS: Oral edoxaban was noninferior to subcutaneous dalteparin with respect to the composite outcome of recurrent venous thromboembolism or major bleeding. The rate of recurrent venous thromboembolism was lower but the rate of major bleeding was higher with edoxaban than with dalteparin. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo; Hokusai VTE Cancer ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02073682 .).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1711948

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 1,633

Metadata

Authors
Raskob, G. E., van Es, N., Verhamme, P., Carrier, M., Di Nisio, M., Garcia, D., Grosso, M. A., Kakkar, A. K., Kovacs, M. J., Mercuri, M. F., Meyer, G., Segers, A., Shi, M., Wang, T.-F., Yeo, E., Zhang, G., Zwicker, J. I., Weitz, J. I., & Büller, H. R.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2018-02-15
Volume
378
Issue
7
Pages
615-624
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2775434460
Cited by
1,633
References
13
FWCI
170.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Edoxaban for the Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1711948
The paper
Raskob, G. E., van Es, N., Verhamme, P., Carrier, M., Di Nisio, M., Garcia, D., Grosso, M. A., Kakkar, A. K., Kovacs, M. J., Mercuri, M. F., Meyer, G., Segers, A., Shi, M., Wang, T.-F., Yeo, E., Zhang, G., Zwicker, J. I., Weitz, J. I., & Büller, H. R. (2018). Edoxaban for the Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1711948

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.