Cited by 359Genomics and Rare DiseasesMetabolism and Genetic DisordersConnective tissue disorders research

Effect of Genetic Diagnosis on Patients with Previously Undiagnosed Disease

Open access
Splinter, Kimberly, Adams, David R., Bacino, Carlos A., Bellen, Hugo J., Bernstein, Jonathan A., Cheatle-Jarvela, Alys M., Eng, Christine M., Esteves, Cecilia +29 more·2018·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many patients remain without a diagnosis despite extensive medical evaluation. The Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN) was established to apply a multidisciplinary model in the evaluation of the most challenging cases and to identify the biologic characteristics of newly discovered diseases. The UDN, which is funded by the National Institutes of Health, was formed in 2014 as a network of seven clinical sites, two sequencing cores, and a coordinating center. Later, a central biorepository, a metabolomics core, and a model organisms screening center were added. METHODS: We evaluated patients who were referred to the UDN over a period of 20 months. The patients were required to have an undiagnosed condition despite thorough evaluation by a health care provider. We determined the rate of diagnosis among patients who subsequently had a complete evaluation, and we observed the effect of diagnosis on medical care. RESULTS: A total of 1519 patients (53% female) were referred to the UDN, of whom 601 (40%) were accepted for evaluation. Of the accepted patients, 192 (32%) had previously undergone exome sequencing. Symptoms were neurologic in 40% of the applicants, musculoskeletal in 10%, immunologic in 7%, gastrointestinal in 7%, and rheumatologic in 6%. Of the 382 patients who had a complete evaluation, 132 received a diagnosis, yielding a rate of diagnosis of 35%. A total of 15 diagnoses (11%) were made by clinical review alone, and 98 (74%) were made by exome or genome sequencing. Of the diagnoses, 21% led to recommendations regarding changes in therapy, 37% led to changes in diagnostic testing, and 36% led to variant-specific genetic counseling. We defined 31 new syndromes. CONCLUSIONS: The UDN established a diagnosis in 132 of the 382 patients who had a complete evaluation, yielding a rate of diagnosis of 35%. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health Common Fund.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1714458

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This genotype-driven approach has revealed new disorders associated with more variable clinical presentation.

    “This genotype-driven approach has revealed new disorders associated with more variable clinical presentation15,16.”

    From A brief history of human disease genetics (2020) · cites this paper as [15]

  • For complex phenotypes without a clear syndrome match, testing has moved toward early exome and genome sequencing.

    “For more complex phenotypes–those without a clear match to a specific syndrome, such as neurodevelopmental disorders and multiple congenital anomalies–testing has gravitated towards early deployment of exome and genome-sequencing platforms that offer speedy resolution of what has historically often been a traumatic diagnostic odyssey15,134.”

    From A brief history of human disease genetics (2020) · cites this paper as [15]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 359

Authors
Splinter, K., Adams, D. R., Bacino, C. A., Bellen, H. J., Bernstein, J. A., Cheatle-Jarvela, A. M., Eng, C. M., Esteves, C., Gahl, W. A., Hamid, R., Jacob, H. J., Kikani, B., Koeller, D. M., Kohane, I. S., Lee, B. H., Loscalzo, J., Luo, X., McCray, A. T., Metz, T. O., Mulvihill, J. J., Nelson, S. F., Palmer, C. G. S., Phillips, J. A., Pick, L., Postlethwait, J. H., Reuter, C., Shashi, V., Sweetser, D. A., Tifft, C. J., Walley, N. M., Wangler, M. F., Westerfield, M., Wheeler, M. T., Wise, A. L., Worthey, E. A., Yamamoto, S., & Ashley, E. A.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • From Harvard Medical School (K.S., C.E., I.S.K., J.L., A.T.M., D.A.S.), Brigham and Women’s Hospital (J.L.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (D.A.S.) — all in Boston; the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (D.R.A., W.A.G., J.J.M., C.J.T.) and the National Human Genome Research Institute (A.L.W.), Bethesda, and the University of Maryland, College Park (A.M.C.-J., B.K., L.P.) — all in Maryland; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (C.A.B., H.J.B., C.M.E., B.H.L., X.L., M.F.W., S.Y.);...
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2018-11-29
Volume
379
Issue
22
Pages
2131-2139
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2896169521
Cited by
359
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 2
FWCI
21.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Vanderbilt University
  • National Institutes of Health (U01TR001395)
  • University of California, Los Angeles
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U01HG010218, U01HG007709, U01HG007943, U01HG007703, U01HG007530, U01HG007674, U01HG007690, U01HG007942, U01HG007708, U01HG007672, R01HG011795)
  • NIH Office of the Director (U01HG007709, U01HG007690, U01HG007530, U01HG007708, U54 NS093793, U01HG007672, U01HG007942)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM113230)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U54NS093793)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
  • Common Fund (U01HG007530, U01TR001395, U01HG007709, U01HG007690, U01HG007672, U01HG007942, U01HG007708, U01HG007943, U54NS093793, U01 HG007703)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
Keywords
Undiagnosed Diseases Network, undiagnosed disease, genetic diagnosis, exome sequencing, genome sequencing, diagnostic rate, new syndrome, genetic counseling, neurological symptoms, biorepository
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Child, Diagnosis, Differential, Drosophila, Female, Genetic Testing, Humans, Male, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Syndrome, United States, Health Care Costs, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Models, Animal, Rare Diseases, Exome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review