Cited by 346Acute Myocardial Infarction ResearchCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Application of High-Sensitivity Troponin in Suspected Myocardial Infarction

Open access
Neumann, Johannes T., Twerenbold, Raphael, Ojeda, Francisco, Sörensen, Nils A., Chapman, Andrew R., Shah, Anoop S.V., Anand, Atul, Boeddinghaus, Jasper +46 more·2019·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data regarding high-sensitivity troponin concentrations in patients presenting to the emergency department with symptoms suggestive of myocardial infarction may be useful in determining the probability of myocardial infarction and subsequent 30-day outcomes. METHODS: In 15 international cohorts of patients presenting to the emergency department with symptoms suggestive of myocardial infarction, we determined the concentrations of high-sensitivity troponin I or high-sensitivity troponin T at presentation and after early or late serial sampling. The diagnostic and prognostic performance of multiple high-sensitivity troponin cutoff combinations was assessed with the use of a derivation-validation design. A risk-assessment tool that was based on these data was developed to estimate the risk of index myocardial infarction and of subsequent myocardial infarction or death at 30 days. RESULTS: Among 22,651 patients (9604 in the derivation data set and 13,047 in the validation data set), the prevalence of myocardial infarction was 15.3%. Lower high-sensitivity troponin concentrations at presentation and smaller absolute changes during serial sampling were associated with a lower likelihood of myocardial infarction and a lower short-term risk of cardiovascular events. For example, high-sensitivity troponin I concentrations of less than 6 ng per liter and an absolute change of less than 4 ng per liter after 45 to 120 minutes (early serial sampling) resulted in a negative predictive value of 99.5% for myocardial infarction, with an associated 30-day risk of subsequent myocardial infarction or death of 0.2%; a total of 56.5% of the patients would be classified as being at low risk. These findings were confirmed in an external validation data set. CONCLUSIONS: A risk-assessment tool, which we developed to integrate the high-sensitivity troponin I or troponin T concentration at emergency department presentation, its dynamic change during serial sampling, and the time between the obtaining of samples, was used to estimate the probability of myocardial infarction on emergency department presentation and 30-day outcomes. (Funded by the German Center for Cardiovascular Research [DZHK]; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00470587, NCT02355457, NCT01852123, NCT01994577, and NCT03227159; and Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry numbers, ACTRN12611001069943, ACTRN12610000766011, ACTRN12613000745741, and ACTRN12611000206921.).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1803377

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies in other areas of medicine have found lower NPVs of even highly sensitive and specific tests in situations where the pretest probability of a disease is high.

    “Studies in other areas of medicine have also found lower NPVs of even highly sensitive and specific tests in situations where the pretest probability of a disease is high23,26,27.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neumann, J. T., Twerenbold, R., Ojeda, F., Sörensen, N. A., Chapman, A. R., Shah, A. S. V., Anand, A., Boeddinghaus, J., Nestelberger, T., Badertscher, P., Mokhtari, A., Pickering, J. W., Troughton, R. W., Greenslade, J., Parsonage, W., Mueller-Hennessen, M., Gori, T., Jernberg, T., Morris, N., Liebetrau, C., Hamm, C., Katus, H. A., Münzel, T., Landmesser, U., Salomaa, V., Iacoviello, L., Ferrario, M. M., Giampaoli, S., Kee, F., Thorand, B., Peters, A., Borchini, R., Jørgensen, T., Söderberg, S., Sans, S., Tunstall-Pedoe, H., Kuulasmaa, K., Renné, T., Lackner, K. J., Worster, A., Body, R., Ekelund, U., Kavsak, P. A., Keller, T., Lindahl, B., Wild, P., Giannitsis, E., Than, M., Cullen, L. A., Mills, N. L., Mueller, C., Zeller, T., Westermann, D., & Blankenberg, S.
Affiliations
  • From the University Heart Center Hamburg (J.T.N., R.T., F.O., N.A.S., T.Z., D.W., S.B.), German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) Partner Site Hamburg–Kiel–Lübeck (J.T.N., N.A.S., T.Z., D.W., S.B.), and the Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg–Eppendorf (T.R.), Hamburg, the Department of Cardiology, Heidelberg University Hospital (M.M.-H., H.A.K., E.G.), and DZHK Partner Site Heidelberg–Mannheim (M.M.-H., H.A.K., E.G.), Heidelberg,...
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • University of Insubria (IT)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2019-06-27
Volume
380
Issue
26
Pages
2529-2540
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2955971301
Cited by
346
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 18
FWCI
34.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • IrInSubria (University of Insubria) (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
  • PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (submittedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • British Heart Foundation (FS/16/75/32533, SP/12/10/29922, FS/16/14/32023)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K023241/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
high-sensitivity troponin, myocardial infarction, troponin I, troponin T, serial sampling, risk assessment tools, 30-day outcomes, emergency department, diagnostic accuracy, prognostic performance, negative predictive value, cardiovascular risk stratification, biomarkers, external validation, low-risk patients, mortality prediction, myocardial infarction recurrence
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Prognosis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Troponin, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Risk Assessment, Troponin I

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review