Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,327

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MRI-Guided Thrombolysis for Stroke with Unknown Time of Onset

Open access
Thomalla, Götz, Simonsen, Claus Z., Boutitie, Florent, Andersen, Grethe, Berthezene, Yves, Cheng, Bastian, Cheripelli, Bharath, Cho, Tae-Hee, Fazekas, Franz, Fiehler, Jens, Ford, Ian, Galinovic, Ivana, Gellissen, Susanne, Golsari, Amir, Gregori, Johannes, Günther, Matthias, Guibernau, Jorge, Häusler, Karl Georg, Hennerici, Michael, Kemmling, André, Marstrand, Jacob, Modrau, Boris, Neeb, Lars, Perez de la Ossa, Natalia, Puig, Josep, Ringleb, Peter, Roy, Pascal, Scheel, Enno, Schonewille, Wouter, Serena, Joaquin, Sunaert, Stefan, Villringer, Kersten, Wouters, Anke, Thijs, Vincent, Ebinger, Martin, Endres, Matthias, Fiebach, Jochen B., Lemmens, Robin, Muir, Keith W., Nighoghossian, Norbert, Pedraza, Salvador, Gerloff, Christian·2018·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Under current guidelines, intravenous thrombolysis is used to treat acute stroke only if it can be ascertained that the time since the onset of symptoms was less than 4.5 hours. We sought to determine whether patients with stroke with an unknown time of onset and features suggesting recent cerebral infarction on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) would benefit from thrombolysis with the use of intravenous alteplase. METHODS: In a multicenter trial, we randomly assigned patients who had an unknown time of onset of stroke to receive either intravenous alteplase or placebo. All the patients had an ischemic lesion that was visible on MRI diffusion-weighted imaging but no parenchymal hyperintensity on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), which indicated that the stroke had occurred approximately within the previous 4.5 hours. We excluded patients for whom thrombectomy was planned. The primary end point was favorable outcome, as defined by a score of 0 or 1 on the modified Rankin scale of neurologic disability (which ranges from 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]) at 90 days. A secondary outcome was the likelihood that alteplase would lead to lower ordinal scores on the modified Rankin scale than would placebo (shift analysis). RESULTS: The trial was stopped early owing to cessation of funding after the enrollment of 503 of an anticipated 800 patients. Of these patients, 254 were randomly assigned to receive alteplase and 249 to receive placebo. A favorable outcome at 90 days was reported in 131 of 246 patients (53.3%) in the alteplase group and in 102 of 244 patients (41.8%) in the placebo group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09 to 2.36; P=0.02). The median score on the modified Rankin scale at 90 days was 1 in the alteplase group and 2 in the placebo group (adjusted common odds ratio, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.17 to 2.23; P=0.003). There were 10 deaths (4.1%) in the alteplase group and 3 (1.2%) in the placebo group (odds ratio, 3.38; 95% CI, 0.92 to 12.52; P=0.07). The rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 2.0% in the alteplase group and 0.4% in the placebo group (odds ratio, 4.95; 95% CI, 0.57 to 42.87; P=0.15). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute stroke with an unknown time of onset, intravenous alteplase guided by a mismatch between diffusion-weighted imaging and FLAIR in the region of ischemia resulted in a significantly better functional outcome and numerically more intracranial hemorrhages than placebo at 90 days. (Funded by the European Union Seventh Framework Program; WAKE-UP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01525290; and EudraCT number, 2011-005906-32 .).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1804355

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 1,327

Metadata

Authors
Thomalla, G., Simonsen, C. Z., Boutitie, F., Andersen, G., Berthezene, Y., Cheng, B., Cheripelli, B., Cho, T.-H., Fazekas, F., Fiehler, J., Ford, I., Galinovic, I., Gellissen, S., Golsari, A., Gregori, J., Günther, M., Guibernau, J., Häusler, K. G., Hennerici, M., Kemmling, A., Marstrand, J., Modrau, B., Neeb, L., Perez de la Ossa, N., Puig, J., Ringleb, P., Roy, P., Scheel, E., Schonewille, W., Serena, J., Sunaert, S., Villringer, K., Wouters, A., Thijs, V., Ebinger, M., Endres, M., Fiebach, J. B., Lemmens, R., Muir, K. W., Nighoghossian, N., Pedraza, S., & Gerloff, C.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2018-08-16
Volume
379
Issue
7
Pages
611-622
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2803802119
Cited by
1,327
References
4
FWCI
108.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MRI-Guided Thrombolysis for Stroke with Unknown Time of Onset. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1804355
The paper
Thomalla, G., Simonsen, C. Z., Boutitie, F., Andersen, G., Berthezene, Y., Cheng, B., Cheripelli, B., Cho, T.-H., Fazekas, F., Fiehler, J., Ford, I., Galinovic, I., Gellissen, S., Golsari, A., Gregori, J., Günther, M., Guibernau, J., Häusler, K. G., Hennerici, M., . . . Gerloff, C. (2018). MRI-Guided Thrombolysis for Stroke with Unknown Time of Onset. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1804355

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.