Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Volatile Anesthetics versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Cardiac Surgery

Open access
Landoni, Giovanni, Lomivorotov, Vladimir V., Nigro Neto, Caetano, Monaco, Fabrizio, Pasyuga, Vadim V., Bradic, Nikola, Lembo, Rosalba, Gazivoda, Gordana, Likhvantsev, Valery V., Lei, Chong, Lozovskiy, Andrey, Di Tomasso, Nora, Bukamal, Nazar A.R., Silva, Fernanda S., Bautin, Andrey E., Ma, Jun, Crivellari, Martina, Farag, Ahmed M.G.A., Uvaliev, Nikolay S., Carollo, Cristiana, Pieri, Marina, Kunstýř, Jan, Wang, Chew Yin, Belletti, Alessandro, Hajjar, Ludhmila A., Grigoryev, Evgeny V., Agrò, Felice E., Riha, Hynek, El-Tahan, Mohamed R., Scandroglio, A. Mara, Elnakera, Abeer M., Baiocchi, Massimo, Navalesi, Paolo, Shmyrev, Vladimir A., Severi, Luca, Hegazy, Mohammed A., Crescenzi, Giuseppe, Ponomarev, Dmitry N., Brazzi, Luca, Arnoni, Renato, Tarasov, Dmitry G., Jovic, Miomir, Calabrò, Maria G., Bove, Tiziana, Bellomo, Rinaldo, Zangrillo, Alberto·2019·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Volatile (inhaled) anesthetic agents have cardioprotective effects, which might improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic, multicenter, single-blind, controlled trial at 36 centers in 13 countries. Patients scheduled to undergo elective CABG were randomly assigned to an intraoperative anesthetic regimen that included a volatile anesthetic (desflurane, isoflurane, or sevoflurane) or to total intravenous anesthesia. The primary outcome was death from any cause at 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 5400 patients were randomly assigned: 2709 to the volatile anesthetics group and 2691 to the total intravenous anesthesia group. On-pump CABG was performed in 64% of patients, with a mean duration of cardiopulmonary bypass of 79 minutes. The two groups were similar with respect to demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline, the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass, and the number of grafts. At the time of the second interim analysis, the data and safety monitoring board advised that the trial should be stopped for futility. No significant difference between the groups with respect to deaths from any cause was seen at 1 year (2.8% in the volatile anesthetics group and 3.0% in the total intravenous anesthesia group; relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 1.29; P = 0.71), with data available for 5353 patients (99.1%), or at 30 days (1.4% and 1.3%, respectively; relative risk, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.76), with data available for 5398 patients (99.9%). There were no significant differences between the groups in any of the secondary outcomes or in the incidence of prespecified adverse events, including myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing elective CABG, anesthesia with a volatile agent did not result in significantly fewer deaths at 1 year than total intravenous anesthesia. (Funded by the Italian Ministry of Health; MYRIAD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02105610.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1816476

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
Landoni, G., Lomivorotov, V. V., Nigro Neto, C., Monaco, F., Pasyuga, V. V., Bradic, N., Lembo, R., Gazivoda, G., Likhvantsev, V. V., Lei, C., Lozovskiy, A., Di Tomasso, N., Bukamal, N. A. R., Silva, F. S., Bautin, A. E., Ma, J., Crivellari, M., Farag, A. M. G. A., Uvaliev, N. S., Carollo, C., Pieri, M., Kunstýř, J., Wang, C. Y., Belletti, A., Hajjar, L. A., Grigoryev, E. V., Agrò, F. E., Riha, H., El-Tahan, M. R., Scandroglio, A. M., Elnakera, A. M., Baiocchi, M., Navalesi, P., Shmyrev, V. A., Severi, L., Hegazy, M. A., Crescenzi, G., Ponomarev, D. N., Brazzi, L., Arnoni, R., Tarasov, D. G., Jovic, M., Calabrò, M. G., Bove, T., Bellomo, R., & Zangrillo, A.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2019-03-28
Volume
380
Issue
13
Pages
1214-1225
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2924124589
Cited by
279
References
4
FWCI
29.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Volatile Anesthetics versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Cardiac Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1816476
The paper
Landoni, G., Lomivorotov, V. V., Nigro Neto, C., Monaco, F., Pasyuga, V. V., Bradic, N., Lembo, R., Gazivoda, G., Likhvantsev, V. V., Lei, C., Lozovskiy, A., Di Tomasso, N., Bukamal, N. A. R., Silva, F. S., Bautin, A. E., Ma, J., Crivellari, M., Farag, A. M. G. A., Uvaliev, N. S., . . . Zangrillo, A. (2019). Volatile Anesthetics versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Cardiac Surgery. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1816476

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.