Cited by 153Hemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersMalaria Research and ControlHemophilia Treatment and Research

Hydroxyurea dose escalation for sickle cell anemia in Sub-Saharan Africa

Open access
John, Chandy C., Opoka, Robert O., Latham, Teresa S., Hume, Heather A., Nabaggala, Catherine, Kasirye, Phillip, Ndugwa, Christopher M., Lane, Adam +1 more·2020·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hydroxyurea has proven safety, feasibility, and efficacy in children with sickle cell anemia in sub-Saharan Africa, with studies showing a reduced incidence of vaso-occlusive events and reduced mortality. Dosing standards remain undetermined, however, and whether escalation to the maximum tolerated dose confers clinical benefits that outweigh treatment-related toxic effects is unknown. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind trial, we compared hydroxyurea at a fixed dose (approximately 20 mg per kilogram of body weight per day) with dose escalation (approximately 30 mg per kilogram per day). The primary outcome was a hemoglobin level of 9.0 g or more per deciliter or a fetal hemoglobin level of 20% or more after 24 months. Secondary outcomes included the incidences of malaria, vaso-occlusive crises, and serious adverse events. RESULTS: Children received hydroxyurea at a fixed dose (94 children; mean [±SD] age, 4.6±1.0 years) or with dose escalation (93 children; mean age, 4.8±0.9 years); the mean doses were 19.2±1.8 mg per kilogram per day and 29.5±3.6 mg per kilogram per day, respectively. The data and safety monitoring board halted the trial when the numbers of clinical events were significantly lower among children receiving escalated dosing than among those receiving a fixed dose. At trial closure, 86% of the children in the dose-escalation group had reached the primary-outcome thresholds, as compared with 37% of the children in the fixed-dose group (P<0.001). Children in the dose-escalation group had fewer sickle cell-related adverse events (incidence rate ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34 to 0.54), vaso-occlusive pain crises (incidence rate ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.56), cases of acute chest syndrome or pneumonia (incidence rate ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.56), transfusions (incidence rate ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.43), and hospitalizations (incidence rate ratio, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.34). Laboratory-confirmed dose-limiting toxic effects were similar in the two groups, and there were no cases of severe neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Among children with sickle cell anemia in sub-Saharan Africa, hydroxyurea with dose escalation had superior clinical efficacy to that of fixed-dose hydroxyurea, with equivalent safety. (Funded by the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation and the Cincinnati Children's Research Foundation; NOHARM MTD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03128515.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2000146

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dose escalation was superior to fixed dosing when studied in Ugandan children.

    “Dose escalation was also superior to fixed dosing when studied in Ugandan children.80”

    From Fetal hemoglobin in sickle cell anemia (2020) · cites this paper as [80]

  • Hydroxyurea is also used effectively in low-resource countries.

    “Hydroxyurea is also used effectively in low-resource countries.73,79,80”

    From Fetal hemoglobin in sickle cell anemia (2020) · cites this paper as [80]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 153

Authors
John, C. C., Opoka, R. O., Latham, T. S., Hume, H. A., Nabaggala, C., Kasirye, P., Ndugwa, C. M., Lane, A., & Ware, R. E.
Affiliations
Indiana University Health (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2020-06-25
Volume
382
Issue
26
Pages
2524-2533
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W3037454550
Cited by
153
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
9.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (ICRA 2016156)
  • Cincinnati Children’s Research Foundation (None)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hemophilia Treatment and Research
Keywords
hydroxyurea, sickle cell disease, dose escalation, pediatric patients, maximum tolerated dose, fetal hemoglobin, hemoglobin levels, vaso-occlusive crisis, acute chest syndrome, malaria, transfusion requirements, treatment toxicity, sub-Saharan Africa, hospitalization, malaria hospitalization
MeSH terms
Anemia, Sickle Cell, Antisickling Agents, Child, Preschool, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hydroxyurea, Malaria, Male, Prospective Studies, Uganda, Incidence, Peripheral Vascular Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review